I still don't quite get what you're arguing. Are you against Tanev himself as a player or his contract? That is still quite unclear. I think you are getting way too hung up on labels to be honest. 4th line for the Jets...who cares?
Who cares if it's 3rd line or 4th line or whatever? As long as Tanev and whoever he plays with provide an impactful level of play, who cares? You have provided articles that suggest just that...so why are you complaining?
If this is the "I don't want a 3.5mil player on the "4th line"", then you may as well stop your argument right now.
You also talk about Lowry and how he's the reason Tanev was decent. Okay. Well in the article it says Lowry in the 4th line center. Bjugstad was our 3rd line center. Using labels theory, that means Bjugstad > Lowry. So wouldn't that mean that Tanev+Bjugstad > Tanev+Lowry? And then explain why that is an issue.
Again, if you want to complain that he got a mil too much or 3 years too long, I'll support that all day long. But I 100% believe he will be a positive impact player for the Penguins.
Yes. It's pretty clear JJ is a player JR is looking to move. At this point, it's head in the sand, fingers plugging the ears to arguing that JR wants to keep him.
Hey, if you were Andreas Athanasiou, wouldn't you want to quit on that RedWings roster too?