Peat
Registered User
- Jun 14, 2016
- 29,560
- 25,396
Regarding Carolina and Free Agency, I think it makes all the sense in the world for them to sign Robin Lehner.
Not a bad thought if they can shift one of Reimer and Mrazek, which maybe they can maybe they can't. Incidentally, I wonder what they're going to do about the ED, as they need a goalie signed beyond next season to be exposed and right now I don't think they have that.
And this is also an important point to note. Sheary may even be too much, especially if they can't dump Bjugstad.
If they're that pressed for cap space, I'd rather just go into next year with what they have and let Poulin and Simon battle it out for the top line spot. Make a trade during the season when you have more pro-rated cap space if neither can hold a spot.
Assuming they want to. Let's not forget - a lot of us are frustrated with players and want to just get rid and get some new guys in, but Rutherford isn't, or at least not on the same level. I don't think Rutherford's going to be at all perturbed about simply moving a goalie, getting a cheap bottom pairing guy and calling it the day. Even if he does want to move Bjugstad, he might well be thinking that Bjugstad now and Bjugstad two months into a season after proving some fitness and with pro-rated cap space around is enough of a different proposition value wise to be patient.
I think I'm with you. If it's difficult to get the remodel desired on a couple of spots this off-season, wait a couple of months into the season and see what solutions we get or who shakes loose. But then I'm a big fan of what Rutherford has done in season when opportunities rise.
Fair point, I don’t disagree. All it takes is 1 owner with free cash flow (for big upfront signing bonus) and cap space to get Hall paid. 9 mil x 7 yrs or something like that is my guesstimate for Hall, which might be a little lower than market value for a player of his quality, I’m less in tune with the cap/AAV stuff than I used to be.
Speaking of signing bonuses, unfortunately Bjugstad has a backloaded contract which will make him particularly difficult to move, IMO. I think it would be easier to dump JJ this offseason. I do think Bjugstad also has potential to bounce back.
You might be right on JJ vs Bjugstad, but I think there's a difference there in that Bjugstad is - if fit - a useful NHL player with a somewhat rare offering (RH centre). While JJ is a lot less useful and a lot more common. Not to mention JJ's term - he might be attractive to an Ottawa, and maybe the shortfall in hockey revenue creates a few more Ottawas, but that's about it.
Last edited: