mooseOAK*
Guest
The joke is on us. Here we've been repeating the "two weeks" mantra, but it's always been two years......
The joke is on us. Here we've been repeating the "two weeks" mantra, but it's always been two years......
The people who really suffer is fans in Phoenix and Winnipeg who have to listen to the silence, with the odd wild rumour to speculate on here and there.
I am more inclined to think that the end game will be more of the NHL presenting COG with a contract to purchase the team, from TNSE, with a 7 or 14 day deadline for COG to close with MH, in order to keep the team. During this period, TNSE will conduct there ticket drive and COG will be turning every stone looking for money to support the MH bid. If they fail, team goes to Winnipeg, if they succeed they keep the team.
You make an excellent point. I think when people try to take too much of a micro-economic view they miss out on the big picture.
Every tourism dollar generated specifically from folks in the greater Phoenix area for the Super Bowl (yes, even Scottsdale) went to Maricopa County businesses (regardless of cities); and generated tax revenues for those cities, the county and state.
It also helped all those businesses significantly drive new business into their establishments and positioned themselves for return business. Applies to Glendale businesses, too.
And, most certainly, as Glendale grows and continues to develop retail, hotel, and commercial property around the UOP Stadium, Jobing and Westgate, more of those dollars will stay in Glendale.
Then maybe those other cities, the county, and the state should kick in money instead of making Glendale foot the entire bill.
Money spent by the CoG ( so far ) to get us to where we are today.
$238,000* - Husk Partners, media relations and lobbying.
I think those other mayors are beginning to make statements of support now in the media. I don't think any money will be coming though.
Doing a season ticket drive would just make everyone in Winnipeg really angry with Bettman/the NHL because if the team comes that close to coming back then Glendale/Bettman finds a creative way to keep the team in Glendale, that would just be worse than losing the Jets in the first place.
Losing the team was creating the wound. The AHL team here was at the time salt in the wound. Having this happen would be like pouring aftershave in the wound.
3) When Will Then Be Now? Winnipeg has a breaking point and sources say that mark isn't far off as the city and True North await word from the National Hockey League as to what direction it intends to go with the Phoenix Coyotes.
True North has been incredibly patient, but doesn't want the waiting game they're involved in to drag on much longer. Sources say the league is well aware of Winnipeg's timing concerns, but the NHL remains committed to exhausting every conceivable option to keep the Coyotes in Glendale.
Winnipeg hopes to have an answer this week, or prior to next week's American Hockey League spring meeting, although historically, decisions on franchise locations and divisional adjustments can be made after the AHL's annual gathering so there's no real pressure for Winnipeg to declare the status of the Manitoba Moose for next season.
Two weeks = Too funny!
However, once a decsision is finally made, I will backtrack two weeks and see who gets the prize for being correct. Like the old saying goes, even a blind squirrel finds nut once in awhile.
That was a while back, but it did say that, yes.Wasn't there an article out yesterday saying the AHL isn't pressuring the Moose to make a decision by the meeting and they can wait til June.
That was a while back, but it did say that, yes.
I am comfortable in saying that the absolute LAST thing on the list of concerns of anyone involved in any aspect of a transaction is the needs or desires of the AHL.
Has there been a bigger waste of money than this? I'd hate to see how the "media relations" game would have gone if Glendale wasn't getting some high priced help.
I'm sure all sorts of people support the Coyotes staying in Glendale, just as long as they don't have to pay for it. That includes Hulsizer.
Dreger is 100% absolutely reading these threads.... Notice the heading for #3 in the Dreger Report Today (also its content).
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/dregerreport/
That was a while back, but it did say that, yes.
I am comfortable in saying that the absolute LAST thing on the list of concerns of anyone involved in any aspect of a transaction is the needs or desires of the AHL.
Outlandish claims of inside information: This is subjective and will be at the discretion of the moderator after consulting with other posters and other administrators. Deference will be given to veteran members who have established credibility. If you're an insider, contact us with proof BEFORE you post.
At this juncture, hearsay doesn't fly.
A gentle reminder: