Wingsfan2965*
Registered User
- Dec 30, 2011
- 6,746
- 1
It will drag on until at least Glendale chooses an arena manager.
Which it shouldn't. The writing is already on the wall.
It will drag on until at least Glendale chooses an arena manager.
If the team does move to Seattle, that sound you hear will be ALL the Coyote fans in Arizona, all at once saying, "Sweet, Sweet Justice".
Can somebody confirm Gary Bettman just repeated the "maybe we should go back where we were" sentence, regarding potential relocation?
We'd be treated even worse IMO. This is such a joke, it feels like Canadian markets have to do double the work just to get Bettman and co. to even consider them, while markets like Seattle, KC, even Las Vegas get thrown around it seems on a daily basis and without even knowing if there is a market for hockey in those cities. As long as you have an arena they all seem to be ok, consequences be damned.
Hey Bettman, you can have our run down arena RENT FREE! Who wants to go to a rabid fan base in QC when you can wait 4-5 years on a new arena in Seattle...only in the NHL folks, only in the NHL
One can only speculate, but I think that he might well be trying to sway some other votes. If that doesn't work, I'm sure that he thinks that he'll get political mileage from supporting the Coyotes even if the effort fails. I got the sense from some of his comments that he is wanting the NHL to be painted with some of the responsibility for this. In any case, it is much too late to imagine that there is a viable local ownership candidate, and the NHL seems to have made it plain that they won't tolerate a delay. Daly's comment that "no decision is a decision" is perhaps the most telling quote yet.
Can somebody confirm Gary Bettman just repeated the "maybe we should go back where we were" sentence, regarding potential relocation?
he did
Can somebody confirm Gary Bettman just repeated the "maybe we should go back where we were" sentence, regarding potential relocation?
2B) I believe that may indeed be the case. PKP was a heavy duty bidder in trying to acquire the Habs, serious money, $500M+, the NHL may not want to let him in "on the cheap" so to speak through a Relocation Sale, but would be more than happy to sell him an Expansion Franchise for lets say $350M and in fact are planning to do just that. If they let him buy the Coyotes, that money's gone, and how on earth do they justify a hefty Relo Fee to make up the difference when not 2yrs ago Winnipeg got in for $170M?
Gotta disagree there. I'm sure you are right, some will be happy seeing the team go somewhere other than QC, but I don't think that's the majority. I think the majority of Coyotes fans will react just like those in Winnipeg in '96. They will be mad, they will be pissed, they will feel like someone ripped their heart out, but most importantly... when its all over, they won't give a rats ass where the team ends up, because they will be done with the NHL.
That's pretty cool. Now, if only I believed a word that came out of his mouth...
he did
I'm one of those 13,000, and I can absolutely confirm... in the years that Winnipeg did not have the NHL... I didn't spend one dime directly on the NHL. So by putting a team in Winnipeg, the NHL got a new customer.
"Upside" is a flawed concept when you are sacrificing large chunks of revenue to play in poor hockey markets.
I have never understood the logic behind geographical locations and realignment as the driver for selling franchises. The BoG are very wealthy and successful Alpha business types; they didn't succeed by ignoring dollars on the table. I can't see Jeremy Jacobs taking more than 8 microseconds to ignore scheduling concerns when faced with the prospect of raising HRR across the league, never mind paying out of his franchises pocket to prop up an ailing franchise.
Besides, and I know I'm risking deviating into realignment talk here so I apologise, having Quebec and adding Seattle and Toronto 2 in a few years actually could work quite well for alignments.
I have never understood the logic behind geographical locations and realignment as the driver for selling franchises. The BoG are very wealthy and successful Alpha business types; they didn't succeed by ignoring dollars on the table. I can't see Jeremy Jacobs taking more than 8 microseconds to ignore scheduling concerns when faced with the prospect of raising HRR across the league, never mind paying out of his franchises pocket to prop up an ailing franchise.
Besides, and I know I'm risking deviating into realignment talk here so I apologise, having Quebec and adding Seattle and Toronto 2 in a few years actually could work quite well for alignments.
Bob McCown and John Shannon said that GB and the NHL want $500M for a Toronto expansion team and close to that much for QC. AND HE THINKS HE WILL GET IT!
That's pretty cool. Now, if only I believed a word that came out of his mouth...
He did but it was in the same breath as "maybe we should go somewhere new" ...he was just listing hypotheticals.
Don't trust anything John Shannon says about this situation. He's the one who was trumpetting on Twitter about how the JIG was close to closing the sale after the lockout was over. He doesn't get it.
But, as Killion said, if you relocate to Seattle for $175M and then expand to Toronto and QC for $800M, the league is miles ahead.
Bob McCown and John Shannon said that GB and the NHL want $500M for a Toronto expansion team and close to that much for QC. AND HE THINKS HE WILL GET IT!
Again, then we wonder why we are the ugly sister.
Id dare say McCown & Shannon are quite likely absolutely 110% correct. The NHL looks at Canada's last 3 remaining markets of QC, Toronto2 & Hamilton as absolute Cash Cows. Why play that chip with a Relo? Your talkin close to $2B in Expansion Fee's & Indemnification Payments to Toronto & Buffalo, and... the NHL will get it. You want in? $450M-$500M not out of line considering the sale prices of the Leafs & Habs.