metalfoot
Karlsson!
Genuine question: if the deal couldn't be closed with $308M from Glendale to sweeten the pot, how can it be closed with $0?
Genuine question: if the deal couldn't be closed with $308M from Glendale to sweeten the pot, how can it be closed with $0?
Genuine question: if the deal couldn't be closed with $308M from Glendale to sweeten the pot, how can it be closed with $0?
It can't. All of this is aimed at hoping someone miraculously appears out of no where, and to help put some butts in seats for the rest of the season.
Who's showing up if the Coyotes and NHL came out saying that the deal is done and the Coyotes are screwed?
We discussed this a few pages ago in response to somebody else's question, but why does everyone keep saying the relocation price is less than the expansion fee? On top of that, no way in hell is the Quebec City market as valuable to the league as GTA2 - why would anyone expect that PKP would be willing or able to pay the league as much for an expansion franchise as a Toronto ownership group? None of that makes sense, and no one here has been able to plausibly explain it.
Hell, no one here has even been able to explain why Quebec City supposedly would be able to pay a higher expansion fee than Seattle - "because they're Canadian", which seems to be the implication, doesn't seem that plausible to me.
I got a good one.
Phoenix LXXI Can you hear the sound of the fat lady singing?
The League/Teams would actually pay more in Revenue Sharing if the 'Yotes move - it would just shuffle around who gets the $$$. Under the new CBA, the League is committed to sharing 6.055% of HRR.
Higher HRR from Quebec would lead to increased Revenue Sharing costs plus increased salary costs due to a higher cap.
It can't. All of this is aimed at hoping someone miraculously appears out of no where, and to help put some butts in seats for the rest of the season.
Who's showing up if the Coyotes and NHL came out saying that the deal is done and the Coyotes are screwed?
@dowbboy
When, not if, Jamison's house of cards collapses, look for Calgary oil $$ to try to ride to Bettman's rescue in Phoenix.
5:40 p.m. Thu, Jan 31 from Plantation, FL
Calgary oil $$????? Don't you just love cryptic messages?
I'll say what I said last night again... QC doesn't have an owner who is ready to spend 300-400 million on an expansion team, Seattle most likely does... how can the NHL get more money out of an expansion team in Quebec rather than Seattle? I still don't understand this. The TV market thing is also ridiculous, people said the exact same thing about Atlanta>Winnipeg. Gate revenues are still far more important than TV revenues in the NHL and Quebec, like I said, is at an all time high in terms of interest to receive a team. Sure, they'll always take it, but right now would be the best time for the NHL to give that market back a team. PKP is a smart business man, if Seattle is offered a team first he'll growl and lower his offer. Bettman knows this. Bettman also hinted numerous times at the fact that Quebec City was next. Here's an article about it (in French): http://www.lapresse.ca/le-soleil/sp...e-favorable-pour-les-partisans-depouilles.php
Bill Gallacher, owner of the Portland Winterhawks. Billionaire from oil. Rumored to be in on several teams that have recently come up for sale.
I literally just don't understand why people would even think Seattle could get the team over Quebec if the Coyotes were to relocate over the summer... can someone enlighten me with counter arguments? I didn't say I thought it "wasn't right" that QC wouldn't get the team, I just said it makes a ton more sense and I explained why.
They're in the process of building the new arena, an obvious expense. Getting the Coyotes in relocation fees would be another expense. And is the old Colisée completely ready for a 2 year resident, or would that be another expense?
They're in the process of building the new arena, an obvious expense. Getting the Coyotes in relocation fees would be another expense. And is the old Colisée completely ready for a 2 year resident, or would that be another expense?
I'll say what I said last night again... QC doesn't have an owner who is ready to spend 300-400 million on an expansion team, Seattle most likely does... how can the NHL get more money out of an expansion team in Quebec rather than Seattle? I still don't understand this. The TV market thing is also ridiculous, people said the exact same thing about Atlanta>Winnipeg. Gate revenues are still far more important than TV revenues in the NHL and Quebec, like I said, is at an all time high in terms of interest to receive a team. Sure, they'll always take it, but right now would be the best time for the NHL to give that market back a team. PKP is a smart business man, if Seattle is offered a team first he'll growl and lower his offer. Bettman knows this. Bettman also hinted numerous times at the fact that Quebec City was next. Here's an article about it (in French): http://www.lapresse.ca/le-soleil/sp...e-favorable-pour-les-partisans-depouilles.php
There's also a video where he said that a few pages back. There's also the fact that Seattle is just flat out not ready. I literally just don't understand why people would even think Seattle could get the team over Quebec if the Coyotes were to relocate over the summer... can someone enlighten me with counter arguments? I didn't say I thought it "wasn't right" that QC wouldn't get the team, I just said it makes a ton more sense and I explained why.
Genuine question: if the deal couldn't be closed with $308M from Glendale to sweeten the pot, how can it be closed with $0?
Sorry if this has been posted before, but an interesting tweet:
bruce dowbiggin
This is from Bruce Dowbiggin of The Globe & Mail.
Here's a link to his tweet: https://mobile.twitter.com/dowbboy/status/297036676608434176?p=v
Calgary oil $$????? Don't you just love cryptic messages?
I wish they grow some backbone and toss the NHL out the door now. Would serve them right for jerking Glendale off for four years. The sooner they start working on doing something else with that building the better it would be for the CoG.Whatever the COG decides to do next, I hope they don't have a bunch of dopey council members willing to abide someone like Jamison refusing to name his investors. That seemed like a pretty big red flag from the start.
I could see the new COG council offering up $10 million or so in AMF annually for the next 20 years, giving the NHL a firm deadline for a sale, and then moving on.
But time will soon tighten up for an NHL "plan B", so things better develop quickly.