gertbfrobe16
Registered User
- Feb 3, 2018
- 5,553
- 7,561
good question. just wanted to see if anyone is still trying , i guess, and harper was one of the few.My question is, why are you still watching?
good question. just wanted to see if anyone is still trying , i guess, and harper was one of the few.My question is, why are you still watching?
Harper embodies Philly. He's the ultimate "no one likes me (us), I don't care" guy. Day in and day out he gives 100%. Endeared to the city and fans, and a damn good player who thrives in the spotlight and negative attention.
What a signing.
The Washington Nationals in 15 seasons have never won a playoff series. The Phillies have won 6 in that time. Remember when they shutdown Strasburg as Rizzo said somerhing about multiple World series? Well 7 years later and they have yet to win a playoff series and probably arent rhis year.
Harper embodies Philly. He's the ultimate "no one likes me (us), I don't care" guy. Day in and day out he gives 100%. Endeared to the city and fans, and a damn good player who thrives in the spotlight and negative attention.
What a signing.
Him and Realmuto were fantastic adds. Haseley was another bright spot for this long sad season
Saw that, though nothing officially has been repeated that I saw.I think we, as Phillies fans, need to go down to DC today and have a rumble to defend Bryce and his family’s honor.
Fans in Washington were rumored to be yelling at Bryce last night things about his wife and his newborn. Bryce was none too happy about it.
I can't imagine the park factor has that big an impact. Some for sure but that is a huge gap, more than two full wins. I don't even think that coupled with defense makes up that sizeable a gap. Maybe I am just too crotchety but I just don't like a system that when explaining a statistic it also requires you to use ten different stats that need to be thoroughly explained (each of which includes another ten stats needing to be explained) in order to justify something.@DrinkFightFlyers Look at the Park factors at the time for Dodger Stadium and CBP. All rWAR for pitchers is predicated on runs allowed and defense, unlike fWAR with FIP. So my guess is that the park factors and the team defense were more favorable for Kershaw. Lee that year was at 8.5 in about the same innings and Hamels was at 6.4 in 216 innings.
Well I think that is a pretty common thing, but it is more than that. I shouldn't have to have an in depth knowledge of mathematical equations and statistics to try and quantify how good a player is. The Halladay/Keeshaw example is just one of many that you can find just by looking at MVP or Cy Young Voting and comparing the WAR of players.So you don't like things that you don't understand. Got it.
Go to the 2011 team page for both on baseball reference. Towards the bottom they have pitching value and it sort of explains. Halladay's defense was .26 runs per nine worse than Kershaw.I can't imagine the park factor has that big an impact. Some for sure but that is a huge gap, more than two full wins. I don't even think that coupled with defense makes up that sizeable a gap. Maybe I am just too crotchety but I just don't like a system that when explaining a statistic it also requires you to use ten different stats that need to be thoroughly explained (each of which includes another ten stats needing to be explained) in order to justify something.
On the note of not liking these stats, word is Joe Maddon is on the market. Is he an advanced stats guy?
I'll give'r a lookGo to the 2011 team page for both on baseball reference. Towards the bottom they have pitching value and it sort of explains. Halladay's defense was .26 runs per nine worse than Kershaw.