The same Habs guy I mentioned earlier made his own top 50 thread and good lord it's as awful as you think it can be. Just holy **** .
MrB1P's top 50 affiliated prospects. Edition 2019-2020.
Sorry, I'll stay on topic now, but it needs to be shared.
The NHL package up here also gives us OHL games every night they play...usually 4-5 games a night, as part of the package.He said he lives in Montreal and gets 10+ CHL games per week. His stupid list aside, how nice would it be to live somewhere where they took hockey that seriously? (Personally, I'm completely over hockey at the moment and need a serious break, but in general it just sounds amazing.) (I mean, you would still get to watch "The Bachelor," in addition to all that hockey.)
Imagine thinking Josh Brook is the 13th best prospect in hockey immediately after a draft.
It was hak the confidence vacuum. Just sucks it out of players.
He said he lives in Montreal and gets 10+ CHL games per week. His stupid list aside, how nice would it be to live somewhere where they took hockey that seriously? (Personally, I'm completely over hockey at the moment and need a serious break, but in general it just sounds amazing.) (I mean, you would still get to watch "The Bachelor," in addition to all that hockey.)
Hexy and Hak certainly looked like they didn't enjoy public nature of their job.Fletcher and Flahr are certainly far more open than previous management. Getting information or honest assessments out of them was like pulling teeth.
This was his latest post:The same Habs guy I mentioned earlier made his own top 50 thread and good lord it's as awful as you think it can be. Just holy **** .
MrB1P's top 50 affiliated prospects. Edition 2019-2020.
Sorry, I'll stay on topic now, but it needs to be shared.
For me I think Zamula+Kalynuk have pretty much ~#5 upside or so. Zamula wont get PP time in the NHL most likely, neither will Kalynuk - though tbf to Kalynuk he does not rely on PP for production really. I could see both maybe becoming #4's I guess.
Morin probably could play as a #5 now and hold his own. In limited NHL minutes he has held his own so far... not looked out of place.
For me Allison vs Laczynski is all down to upside. Allison I think has legit 2nd line ~50 point upside. Not sure Laczynski has more than solid 3rd line upside, and I am not sure he is a C at the next level either. NAK, Kase etc have similar kind of upside and I think are closer.
This was his latest post:
I wouldn't trade any of the Habs top 5 prospects for Frost, Id trade Ylonen/Primeau/Fleury though.
Look like our own prospect poll is going to have Morin over Zamula and Kalynuk as well . It's just people's opinions and everyone is entitled to one .
Of the 3 PF's, it just seems like Ratcliffe and Allison get the big reputation boost from being 2nd round picks. While the public hasn't caught on to Laczynski.
Laczynski is the smartest, most well-rounded player of the bunch. His scoring is underrated. Two years in row he's lead OSU in pt/g.
Hexy and Hak certainly looked like they didn't enjoy public nature of their job.
I'm not sure why you're so hung up on a possible lack of PP usage. That's such a small factor. It's not where most of Kalynuk and Zamula's value is derived from.
Kalynuk and Zamula are both highly skilled, transitional defensemen with smarts and a good defensive foundation. They are exactly what's in vogue right now. There is a league-wide shortage of this type of player and a great desire to acquire them.
Morin is a guy who's going to struggle just to keep his head above water. His skill-set dictates that he's unlikely to have a a large positive impact on shot/scoring metrics.
Depending on development, Kalynuk and Zamula very well might have real impact. However, Morin will always be a bottom of the lineup player trying to break even.
No one thinks Laczynski is going to play center. Not one person. He has never even played center in college.
Of the 3 PF's, it just seems like Ratcliffe and Allison get the big reputation boost from being 2nd round picks. While the public hasn't caught on to Laczynski.
Laczynski is the smartest, most well-rounded player of the bunch. His scoring is underrated. Two years in row he's lead OSU in pt/g.
JMO, but the gap between the three is not large. Having them ranked 4, 8, 21, in whatever order, seems incorrect.
Imagine thinking Josh Brook is the 13th best prospect in hockey immediately after a draft.
I think one reason Laczynski might be behind Cates is that IQ and defense are more valuable at center.
The reasoning is simple, a two way center can carry one dimensional wings (Couts' career), but a two way forward can't really compensate for a flawed center.