I just don't feel it's right in general (obviously there are exceptions) to judge a goalie on screenshots or odd-man rushes. To me, a soft goal is usually given up when the goalie is square to the shooter with no screen and has time to get set. I mentioned above the Nylander goal vs. TOR comes to mind when thinking about that, or that OT losing goal against Buffalo when buddy took a slapper from the boards and beat him clean.
To be like "he should have had that, he should have done this" on high % plays in favour of the players coming down on him isn't fair to me. I don't buy the "he's making 10.5 million a year" excuse. He's making that money for consistently great goaltending, which, since Weber has come back, he's provided and the numbers back it up. Saying he should have most/all of the 2 on 1s or screens or breakaways to me isn't fair at all. How about the team should be the ones not giving up these plays? How about that save on Arvidsson on the breakaway to keep us in the game?
We lost that game because our PP sucked ass and guys aren't bearing down on quality chances. Making mistakes against Nashville, or Tampa, or Toronto... This is going to kill you. That's why they are where they are, because they make you pay for those. Drouin and Benn were absolute DUMMIES on both of those goals, yet we're here criticizing Price because he couldn't bail them out. Nah, not a fan.