<bro fist bump>
The all-seeing eye will tell you everything you need to know. People have fallen in love with advanced stats. It's good to add advanced stats as a small part of the conversation, but not the entire argument.
I will fight this battle til my dying day.
No one's eyes are perfect.
No one's stats are perfect.
There are some people on this board whom I really respect. When they talk hockey, you
know they understand it. But those same people are prone to bias. We all are, we're humans. And in this case, we're all fans. Those biases have a way of trickling into people's "eye tests" and tinting them.
In this thread alone, there have been some very smart people saying some things that make me shake my head. Those people didn't stop knowing hockey. Their eye tests didn't get worse. They just have a bias that affects them.
Stats also have issues. Maybe not bias-related issues, but big issues. Stats, like basic Corsi, struggle to provide context for the numbers they are giving you. Sure, we get QoC and QoTeammates, but someone like Chris Kunitz is a +Corsi player. That doesn't mesh with the eye test. Why?
Well, when you play with Sidney Crosby and you play with Kris Letang or Simon Despres (I believe these are the two most-common pairs for the Sid line), you're going to have higher possession than if you were playing with Sill and Adams. So is it Kunitz who is driving possession, or are other people driving Kunitz's possession?
No one should ever outright dismiss the eye test.
No one should ever outright dismiss advanced stats.
The best way to approach the situation is to find a way to marry the two. People who belittle stat users are wrong. People who belittle eye testers are wrong. It's worse when people approach the situation belligerently. The 'nerds' will get defensive and lash out. The old school dinosaurs will be protective and attack. By the end of it, no one is communicating. Yay, internet.