SHOOTANDSCORE
Eeny Meeny Miny Moe
- Sep 25, 2005
- 10,952
- 4,675
Kobasew was brutal last night. It has to have to do with Megna needing some easying into the lineup. Because it cant possible be performance based.
Maybe they are saying that this is your last shot, perform or youll get waived when the lineup is healthy? I knoe hes a veteran so there is a bigger chance Megne geting sent down than kobasew waived, but one can wish, right?
Well, that's even worse when you consider that "manchot" is most commonly used to described someone who misses an arm/forearm
It makes sense, in French, for penguins to be called manchot exactly because of what the common noun means. A penguin's wings looks very much like a man without forearms. So Pascal Dupuis is right at home in a Penguins uniform
Does that make him a 2nd line player because he scored a goal on it?
Take a look at our lineup the past month and let me know if Pyatt stays on as the second line winger when all of our players are finally healthy again. Oh hey! That will be tomorrow. Thanksssssss
Pretty sure the thread title says "Pens v. Habs of to report." Then again, I can't remember whether "avant" means before, soon, under, inner (etc), nor whether d'avant means something different, so I probably shouldn't talk. I'll go with under just for the Hell of it.
PENS V HABS OF TO REPORT (for) UNDERGAME.
Pretty badass when you put it that way.
Report before game.
We can modify the title to
Les trios pathetique de Dan Bylsma
You're completely missing the original point cheesedanish was making. We haven't scored a goal from our third line in a month. You can't use the "when everybody is healthy" argument, because Pyatt won't even be on the third line when everyone is healthy. Or, should I say when the rentals are acquired.
cheesedanish's point remains...we're getting nothing out of the third line...except when they suddenly play with Malkin (if that makes you feel better).
Pretty sure the thread title says "Pens v. Habs of to report." Then again, I can't remember whether "avant" means before, soon, under, inner (etc), nor whether d'avant means something different, so I probably shouldn't talk. I'll go with under just for the Hell of it.
PENS V HABS OF TO REPORT (for) UNDERGAME.
Pretty badass when you put it that way.
Jokinen scored when he was with Sutter against Washington, but I'm not sure if that counts since Jokinen is a 2nd line player. I've confused myself.
THE QUALITY OF THREAD TITLE MATCHES THE QUALITY OF PLAY
geez, one bilateral title and everyone's a linguinist
Jokinen scored when he was with Sutter against Washington, but I'm not sure if that counts since Jokinen is a 2nd line player. I've confused myself.
kobasew was lazy backchecking on like his first shift. you cant even make this stuff up. how can i guy that should be unemployed fail to backcheck his face off right out of the gate? did he think he needed to conserve energy for the third? just absurd.
THE QUALITY OF THREAD TITLE MATCHES THE QUALITY OF PLAY
geez, one bilateral title and everyone's a linguinist
Is this Randy Cunneyworth?
I like stuff like that, actually. Guy I follow on twitter (Sportsnet's Justin Bourne) occasionally mistranslates RDS tweets and it cracks me up every time.
Renaud Lavoie used "mourir" in the same tweet associated with some player's name and Bourne took the opportunity to announce that the guy in question had died, which the original tweet didn't remotely say.
I feel like someone should make a list of all the bad move/choices that DB has during the season in games and outside just to see how many we can get.
George Gillett, actually. I'm a frenchaphone
My favorite was going to Mexico with my friend and his brother, both from Alabama. Listening to them "speak Spanish" with their painfully southern, phonetic pronunciations was magical.
I believe Jokinen scored on a 4 on 4, i wouldn't consider Jokinen scoring on a 4 on 4 goal with Sutter as a goal from your bottom 6 forwards.
Used to know a dude from Senegal who was always dogging me on my horrible, usually drunken, attempts at french. Understood just enough to know exactly what he thought about the quality of what was taught in French classes in United States high schools.
If they were just trying to EASE Megna back, he wouldn't have played on the fourth line. There's room on the third line for him. He had like one shift last night with the top line, the rest were fourth line shifts with a variety of hodgepodge. I am not one who believes Bylsma is a huge Megna fan. Some here think so, but I don't. For his production level, this guy should AT LEAST be playing on the third line right now.
That's GOLD!
You're completely missing the original point cheesedanish was making. We haven't scored a goal from our third line in a month. You can't use the "when everybody is healthy" argument, because Pyatt won't even be on the third line when everyone is healthy. Or, should I say when the rentals are acquired.
cheesedanish's point remains...we're getting nothing out of the third line...except when they suddenly play with Malkin (if that makes you feel better).
I'd like to see Megna given a valid shot beside Crosby, because, have you seen our other options? May as well try him. I'm not sure I trust him to be any better though, but still worth the chance.