dogthateats
Registered User
I’d rather have some youngish coach like what Montreal did than some retread dinosaur guy like what 75% of the league does. I am saying some brave stuff in general today though
Matt Cullen for coach. Daddy's home, and he's not happy.I’d rather have some youngish coach like what Montreal did than some retread dinosaur guy like what 75% of the league does. I am saying some brave stuff in general today though
“I played until age 45 and so can you!”pamphlets on day 1Matt Cullen for coach. Daddy's home, and he's not happy.
They could make a coaching change now AND in 3-4-5 years when the core retires. It would be like....ya know....a normal NHL coaching stint.Honestly? I say just let Sullivan ride off into the sunset with the rest of the guys of the era. It doesn't really f***ing matter at this point. This team should've fired him after he botched the Habs play-in, now we're two and a half years beyond that, so who cares?
Make a coaching change when it's time for the rebuild and you've got an organization full of young players and prospects. Switching shit up now doesn't do much. Maybe they make the playoffs, maybe they make the second round if the stars align and everybody remains healthy and playing to their ability. Sullivan's not holding back some team on the brink of another Cup, imo.
He's annoying in his TOI distribution and tendencies regarding lines, but whatever. All coaches are. Like @dogthateats says, unless you grab some younger coach guy that hasn't had the "play 'em to a draw, veteran leadership above all" mantra bashed into his head yet, it doesn't matter.
My big thing, for years, is that I really question whether Sullivan's even capable of navigating the rebuild chapter as a coach. I have next to zero faith he'd allow the more skilled, creative guys to do their thing instead of trying to reshape them into NHL veteran drones in the shape of the ZAR mold. Risk averse to a nauseating degree. Would rather wring the creativity and flow out of a guy's game than even chance the dude taking a risk with the puck.
They are 3 points out of a guaranteed playoff spot. Not exactly a danger zone.Aren't we at that point? I know it's super early, but at the same time we're sitting, what, second last in the division and about 13th or 14th in a 16 team conference? And this isn't the Pacific division where finishing .500 might even get you in the playoffs.
10 or 11 games in seems like little, but all it takes is for this slump to last another 5 or 6 games and it could be a hole in a tough division/conference that's hard to dig out of.
They are 3 points out of a guaranteed playoff spot. Not exactly a danger zone.
This time last year, they were 8th in the Metro and 14th in the east. They were five points out of a guaranteed playoff spot (third in the Metro) and three points out of a wild card spot.They have a point percentage of .455 and have played more games than everyone above them outside of the Rangers, Leafs and Caps.
You sound like Ron Hextall, advocating for the bare minimum.Honestly? I say just let Sullivan ride off into the sunset with the rest of the guys of the era. It doesn't really f***ing matter at this point. This team should've fired him after he botched the Habs play-in, now we're two and a half years beyond that, so who cares?
Make a coaching change when it's time for the rebuild and you've got an organization full of young players and prospects. Switching shit up now doesn't do much. Maybe they make the playoffs, maybe they make the second round if the stars align and everybody remains healthy and playing to their ability. Sullivan's not holding back some team on the brink of another Cup, imo.
He's annoying in his TOI distribution and tendencies regarding lines, but whatever. All coaches are. Like @dogthateats says, unless you grab some younger coach guy that hasn't had the "play 'em to a draw, veteran leadership above all" mantra bashed into his head yet, it doesn't matter.
My big thing, for years, is that I really question whether Sullivan's even capable of navigating the rebuild chapter as a coach. I have next to zero faith he'd allow the more skilled, creative guys to do their thing instead of trying to reshape them into NHL veteran drones in the shape of the ZAR mold. Risk averse to a nauseating degree. Would rather wring the creativity and flow out of a guy's game than even chance the dude taking a risk with the puck.
I agree we aren't firing him and the team hasn't quit.We are not firing Sully. The team has not quit on him. This is an ugly stretch but it's the same team that was blowing doors off to start the season. Give it time.
We are not firing Sully. The team has not quit on him.
We are not firing Sully. The team has not quit on him. This is an ugly stretch but it's the same team that was blowing doors off to start the season. Give it time.
Playoff revenue matters to FSG I imagine.Meh... Depends if you think the roster is good enough to win a Cup. If not, then what does it matter?
It’s not even that. What we like in Martin is that he is not afraid to let the kids grow and learn from their mistakes. Meanwhile we’ve only had coaches that punish youth for mistakes but let veterans get away with any mistake.I’d rather have some youngish coach like what Montreal did than some retread dinosaur guy like what 75% of the league does. I am saying some brave stuff in general today though
Matt Cullen for coach. Daddy's home, and he's not happy.
Blew the door off the Yotes, Habs, and Blue Jackets.We are not firing Sully. The team has not quit on him. This is an ugly stretch but it's the same team that was blowing doors off to start the season. Give it time.
Knights - CassidyI’d rather have some youngish coach like what Montreal did than some retread dinosaur guy like what 75% of the league does. I am saying some brave stuff in general today though