Peat
Registered User
- Jun 14, 2016
- 29,467
- 25,317
I feel like we've got three good-odds shots and we only need to make two. It would be nicer if they were more established and the odds felt more certain, but its still a good situation.
I'm not worried about DeSmith being the backup, there are definitely some worse backups than him in the NHL. DeSmith was really solid for the Penguins last year, I don't see any reason to not expect that going forward. It's not like they need him to be crazy good or anything.
Jarry is probably being traded in the future, next offseason is a fair guess IMO.
How much bigger of a role can DeSmith expect? He's not a NHL starting goalie, so he's just going to be a backup anywhere he goes.I think DeSmith will walk after this year since he will be a UFA and probably want a larger role. Jarry will take over the backup role.
That's the only reason I'm a bit skeptical of him being traded.
Why is Jarry being traded? Unless he gets to play 20+ games and looks like a stud and some team is willing to trade him as a starter, I see no reason to trade him.
How much bigger of a role can DeSmith expect? He's not a NHL starting goalie, so he's just going to be a backup anywhere he goes.
But his point was that they wouldn't trade Jarry because deSmith would leave for a bigger role. If they traded Jarry, deSmith's role in Pittsburgh would be as big of a role as it would be anywhere else in the NHL (if not bigger given Murray's injury history).Which is more than he'll be here if Jarry usurps him.
But his point was that they wouldn't trade Jarry because deSmith would leave for a bigger role. If they traded Jarry, deSmith's role in Pittsburgh would be as big of a role as it would be anywhere else in the NHL (if not bigger given Murray's injury history).
Why is Jarry being traded? Unless he gets to play 20+ games and looks like a stud and some team is willing to trade him as a starter, I see no reason to trade him.
Because if DeSmith proves to be a solid backup, then Jarry remains one of our semi-valuable semi-expendable assets.
Sure, but again, unless he gets enough playing time to prove he's starter material, he isn't going to return all that much IMO. I'd prefer to keep a Murray/Jarry tandem as long as it's financially feasible.
Because there is going to be another expansion draft and Jarry doesn't have a spot here long term.
We are going to have to lose somebody in the expansion and it's possible that Jarry is the best guy to lose. Not saying that, but it's too early for me to say we should trade him next off season.
I truly like this, solid deal. That 1-way/2-way is interesting, not sure if I have seen that one before.
DeSmith will be a UFA next year. Jarry will be an RFA in 2 years. I could understand DeSmith backing up Murray this year, but why would he re-sign here knowing there would be a good chance of Jarry coming up the next year.But his point was that they wouldn't trade Jarry because deSmith would leave for a bigger role. If they traded Jarry, deSmith's role in Pittsburgh would be as big of a role as it would be anywhere else in the NHL (if not bigger given Murray's injury history).
Why is Jarry being traded? Unless he gets to play 20+ games and looks like a stud and some team is willing to trade him as a starter, I see no reason to trade him.
I hope Jarry shows out AND Murray has a bounce back year. That gives you a very valuable trade asset. I actually think it’s more likely Murray proves to be ‘only’ an average starter than Jarry flames out, and that’s more about Jarry than Murray. I worry it sets up a difficult decision for us about who to keep moving forward.
Maybe I'm misreading your original post, but I took your point as "They won't trade Jarry because deSmith might leave for a bigger role." But if they traded Jarry, then deSmith has as big of a role in Pittsburgh as he would anywhere else, so why wouldn't he resign with the Pens?DeSmith will be a UFA next year. Jarry will be an RFA in 2 years. I could understand DeSmith backing up Murray this year, but why would he re-sign here knowing there would be a good chance of Jarry coming up the next year.
When I said bigger role, I meant if he thinks there is a big chance after this year he won't be backing up Murray, I could see him going somewhere that he would be a legit backup.Maybe I'm misreading your original post, but I took your point as "They won't trade Jarry because deSmith might leave for a bigger role." But if they traded Jarry, then deSmith has as big of a role in Pittsburgh as he would anywhere else, so why wouldn't he resign with the Pens?
Anyway, it doesn't matter. I hope they don't trade Jarry. deSmith is a fine back-up, but I think Jarry could be more than that.
It’s a nice change I have to say, rather than veteran and hoping the wheels stay on. We have young and hoping for potential. It maybe different flavor same dinner table. But it is refreshing to be on the other side of the goalie position. And if goes downhill, goalie prices are never THAT high we can’t find a temporary solution.I feel like we've got three good-odds shots and we only need to make two. It would be nicer if they were more established and the odds felt more certain, but its still a good situation.