viper0220
Registered User
- Oct 10, 2008
- 8,573
- 3,500
I think Elliotte Friedman and Darren Derger, just make up nonsense and talk out of their asses.
He played almost half the year with the Pens last season... hard to know about something if you're not paying attention.
Dumb trade idea tbh, but if JR's got that itch he' gonna scratch...
I think Elliotte Friedman and Darren Derger, just make up nonsense and talk out of their asses.
I think Elliotte Friedman and Darren Derger, just make up nonsense and talk out of their asses.
I think Elliotte Friedman and Darren Derger, just make up nonsense and talk out of their asses.
Yeah, you have to worry when a guy has only won 2 out of the last 4 Cups.
They're not looking like favorites this year. How many years do those 2 Cups buy Rutherford? Is 2 of the past 6 Cups good enough to keep his job? 2 of the past 10? 20? Anytime you show a decline there's going to be scrutiny. In the case of JMFJ (or Tanev or Grudbranson...) I'd hardly say GMJR is above reproach.
Kinda seems like Pens need to do something bigger... some trade rumors I keep seeing wont change anything it seems
I honestly haven't been a fan of what JR has done in Pittsburgh
Tanev looks absolutely awesome for the Penguins and Gudbranson looked great last year for the Penguins. If you want to bring up examples of bad acquisitions, you should be adding Hunwick to JJ, not Tanev or Gudbranson.
Jack Johnson and First Rounder gets JJ moved. Don't kid yourself. Rutherford just hasn't offered it up yet.
He has good talents but he gives bad on ice results, he's a weird defenseman. Watching him makes you really happy with his play, then you look at his on ice results and gag.
He's a good skater (especially when carrying the puck), has a rocket of a shot, is a strong puck mover and is a well rounded 2-way player. He just can't combine all of those into good results.
Would anyone pick him up if he was waived?
You think a team carrying 9 D-men and 12 forwards that is also dealing with injuries isn't trying to move an excess D-man?
Wouldn't you need to know the return before judging?Don't see the point of doing this. Riikola is a decent #6 and costs peanuts.
Yes, but Larsson had value around the league at that time. I don't think Riikola has much value right now, mostly because he's been sitting for guys like Johnson and Gudbranson. If he's traded it'll most likely be for peanuts and I don't see the point.Wouldn't you need to know the return before judging?
Did it make sense for the Devils to move Adam Larsson?