Honour Over Glory
Fire Sully
- Jan 30, 2012
- 77,316
- 42,447
Oh you're out that way, probably at that t-mills food court often, huh?This is my local store
Oh you're out that way, probably at that t-mills food court often, huh?This is my local store
Malkin's 5on5 HDCF% is by far highest of his career
lolI don't know what that means but it's got me PUMPED
High danger scoring chances for and againstI don't know what that means but it's got me PUMPED
Malkin's 5on5 HDCF% is by far highest of his career
As an older fan, they're not bad...and will usually make sense IF you watch the games as well. Sometimes posters on this forum don't though.lol
I'm starting to feel old with all these analyticals flying around.
I don't care for 'em one bit. Some are nice, but it gets ridiculous after awhile.
It's like fans of other sports that are way over the top with analytics became hockey fans and brought with them the slog of the numbers games. Analytics base word is anal for a reason.
lol
I'm starting to feel old with all these analyticals flying around.
I don't care for 'em one bit. Some are nice, but it gets ridiculous after awhile.
It's like fans of other sports that are way over the top with analytics became hockey fans and brought with them the slog of the numbers games. Analytics base word is anal for a reason.
Malkin's 5on5 HDCF% is by far highest of his career
YES......
And even worse, a lot of the numbers used are interpretive.
I don't know what that means but it's got me PUMPED
The team is getting 2 high danger chances to our oppositions 1 high danger chance when he is on the ice.
That’s crazy good and should be leading to us out score the opposition significantly when he’s on the ice 5v5
Just checked and it’s 20 goals for and 11 against so the chances are almost identical to the actual goals.
McCann is team best in differential with 23 for and 11 against
Back in my day..... lolYES......
And even worse, a lot of the numbers used are interpretive.
2015 last time a Pens goalie had back to back shut outs
Last time they used MAF and murray and both played great. Going into the playoffs with two good goalies would be great. I hope murray gets his **** together soon.
I am the god of hellfire and bring you fire
Even without Jake I don't think that changes much if Sullivan does the smart thing and puts another competent player (not ZAR or Simon) on Geno's line when Sid comes back. Geno and Rust are the fearsome twosome. Jake doesn't provide a lot for them.
The team is better served with Jake/Sid, Geno/Rust components, than leaving 1 of the centers on an island imo.
Advanced analytics only represent an attempt to measure “process” rather than focusing exclusively on “results”.
In the end, does it matter if a player generates tons of scoring chances if he can’t figure out how to score? Probably not.
What it really helps is identifying players whose production is likely repeatable or the result of just good/bad luck.
It's the other side of analytics that people ignore, the eye test.As an older fan, they're not bad...and will usually make sense IF you watch the games as well. Sometimes posters on this forum don't though.
I don't need anyone to tell me that ZAR is awesome defensively. I've watched enough games to know that his linemates carry him defensively. I also know that Simon is in the same boat. But people on here who don't watch the games will argue that what I'm saying is a lie, because the stats prove otherwise.
Stars of the game:
1. Jarry
2. Jarry
3. Jarry