especially since the puck 'being off the ice' didnt occur until after the puck was coming out of Andersen's pad
PDF Game 3 | Ducks @ Flames | Overtime Topic
- Thread starter No Fun Shogun
- Start date
- Status
especially since the puck 'being off the ice' didnt occur until after the puck was coming out of Andersen's pad
Two inconclusive angles. Puck is in the air. White space doesn't mean it crossed the line completely.
Cross bar is over the goal line. If the puck is off the ice, that's the only angle that's conclusive. If that angle doesn't show it, that the call on the ice should and did stand.
New User Name
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2008
- 12,907
- 1,760
and there was a Bruins fan that thought the game was reffed okay.
and there's a Canuck fan that thinks the game was fairly reffed.
and I'm a Leafs fan that thinks the game was fair.
I'm amazed at Ducks fans complaining as vehemently as they are.
Thepainter
Registered User
Alright guys, was fun but I just want to see a fair series called consistently. Puck was probably in the net but I'm willing to bet none of you would stake your lives on it.
Hope the next game is fun.
Hope the next game is fun.
Yeah, I think your math is off.
I couldn't care less. I have no affiliation here. Stop whining about it then.
didimentionlarseller
Snipers are a dying bread in the NHL
Thepainter
Registered User
Almost isn't really the word I'd use. I'd figure in ridiculous but it's not close.
Pirate King Luffy
Ferkland
It's hockey. I'm sure no one wants to die over it. Besides, we won the game. Why risk your life if you don't need to?
Yup. Bennett slid the puck along the ice. And there's a lot of open ice beside Anderson's leg.
This is a terrible angle. The puck was travelling along Anderson's pads. Furthermore, this angle only shows the puck as it's leaving, not as it's entering.
Thepainter
Registered User
Absolutely! I wasn't being serious about staking your life on it... just that there's nothing there that would make me say it was 100% in (even though, chances are, it was).
New User Name
Registered User
- Jan 2, 2008
- 12,907
- 1,760
IMO the league made the right call on the disallowed goal. (from the replays I've seen)
Though I'm sure that if the Ducks scored a goal like that they'd be arguing it was a good goal as much as Flames fans are. All fan bases would.
Though I'm sure that if the Ducks scored a goal like that they'd be arguing it was a good goal as much as Flames fans are. All fan bases would.
Not as terrible as showing an angle from out front with the puck off the ice. That's exactly why it was ruled inconclusive. There were no angles that showed it conclusively in the net.
Koonta
The Boss Wears White
Well I could go on about the officiating as that was irrelevant to the fact that the Ducks lost.
http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthread.php?t=146870&page=4
Look at post 66. Puck is flat on the ice clear as day. So yes it is most definitely a goal.
Look at post 66. Puck is flat on the ice clear as day. So yes it is most definitely a goal.
MuffinMerc
Come watch TV
- Jan 23, 2013
- 4,065
- 0
Koonta
The Boss Wears White
Nobody is debating the score so I'm not sure what you're going on about...
4 is more than 3....I thought I was pretty clear about it
duckaroosky
So sayeth Duckthulu
Not completely irrelevant. Refs missed some pretty big calls against the ducks but those things happen. Good teams adjust so I have no doubt that the ducks will be much better next game.
4 is more than 3....I thought I was pretty clear about it
We're all happy you can read
- Status
Ad
Latest posts
-
-
Did Ovi carry the Capitals to the playoffs this year?- Latest: AhosDatsyukian
-
Rumor: 2024 Trade Rumors and Free Agency Thread: Post Deadline- Latest: Pokecheque
