PDF Game 3 | Ducks @ Flames | Overtime Topic

[MuffinMerc]

Literally the definition.

No it isn't.

 

[DanZ]

It's your opinion that's it an optical illusion, it's my opinion that's it's a goal.

The fact that people are arguing about it shows that it is inconclusive and therefore the call on the ice shouldn't be overturned. Puck is off the ice, it's not conclusive with that angle. It's not conclusive with the overhead angle. Not conclusive = no goal.

 

[Thepainter]

It's your opinion that's it an optical illusion, it's my opinion that's it's a goal.

The puck was in the air (fact proven by other angles), the angle you are referencing has been mathematically proven to be inaccurate (fact proven by common sense and, well, math), and the other angles were inconclusive (fact).

There's absolutely no way to call that a goal.

 

[duckaroosky]

It's your opinion that's it an optical illusion, it's my opinion that's it's a goal.

I bet you thought the dress was gold and white too.

 

[HanSolo]

After their behavior in round 1, the outrage and whining by Ducks fans makes me smile.

Yeah we were simply incorrigible.

 

[MarkGio]

Yes, it appears the puck is in.

It also appears as though these two airplanes are headed for disaster...

But they're in the air?! So they're actually miles apart from each other!

 

[The Mighty Duck Man]

So Ducks fans know all about the right calls except for the ones called against them. Gotcha.

The only penalty called on the Ducks was the Despres one. The rest, ticky tack or not, it happens, and Vatanen's especially can't be argued. Other than the call on Despres, I'm mostly upset that they put their whistles away for the Flames and only the Flames in the third. Absolutely hate the idea of the score affecting the way the game is called.

 

[Mav3rick07]

Why are we still debating the no-goal call?

The team who was allegedly 'screwed over' by the call won.

End of story, right?

 

[DanZ]

But they're in the air?! So they're actually miles apart from each other!

Just like the puck

 

[Connor McOilers]

Was sitting row 10 behind the ducks bench, same seat I was in for game 6 of the 04 finals when the flames had that other "goal" that looked like it was in. Kinda erie how that worked out. All worked out for the flames though in the end so I hope people don't get too hung up on this one.

Really sad time to be an oilers fan during such an intense game with a great atmospher in the arena, but it still gives me hope for future BOA rivalry games seeing the flames do well. Now hopefully the oilers under new management and the guidance of mcjesus can get it together and make sometching of it.

Props to the flames although I absolutely hate to say it, they really never quit. That said for the rest of this series, go ducks!

 

[Thepainter]

But they're in the air?! So they're actually miles apart from each other!

No obviously they are feet apart! JUST LOOK AT THE PICTURE!!!

 

[The Mighty Duck Man]

No it isn't.

Not word for word, but the situation itself is.

 

[Kanye]

http://gfycat.com/HappygoluckyFrankCopperhead

Looks pretty in to me.

 

[MarkGio]

That's the entire point of what an optical illusion is. Literally the definition.

Figuratively.

Jesus, is this the new bad? Damn hip hop and those middle school drop outs.

 

[DropIt]

Oh cause uh. It would've been 4-3? Cause those penalties would've still happened if the call went Calgary's way? That's cool.

It almost sounds as ridiculous as blaming the game on the officiating, doesnt it?

 

[DanZ]

http://gfycat.com/HappygoluckyFrankCopperhead

Looks pretty in to me.

https://vine.co/v/eZdKE0d53O9

No it doesn't.

 

[didimentionlarseller]

after seeing the airplane photoshop I think the puck was even deeper in the net behind the goal line - im not sure what that proves it's entertaining tho

 

[CgyFlamesftw]

Just like the puck

But there are 2 different angles showing the puck crossed the line with the same amount of white space? Did they not show all the TV angles on NBC feed or what.

 

[Johnny Hoxville]

https://vine.co/v/eZdKE0d53O9

in my opinion you are putting too much weight into an angle the NHL deems mathematically poor

In that angle, the crossbar is clearly blocking the view of the puck. I wouldn't say that makes it a better angle at all.

I think NHL got the call wrong, and if they didn't then the rules they have in place are extremely poor.

 

[Thepainter]

http://gfycat.com/HappygoluckyFrankCopperhead

Looks pretty in to me.

Sure does.

 

[KaseMeOutside]

http://gfycat.com/HappygoluckyFrankCopperhead

Looks pretty in to me.

you are still using the worst angle, and the puck bounces up off the ice after hitting andersens pad the first time

 

[Ace Card Bedard]

Sure the puck could be in the air but it would need to be 5"-6" in the air for that much white to be showing "under" it and still have it be above the line.

Watch the full replay, the puck was absolutely not 5"-6" in the air. It was barely off the ice at all.

That was a goal.

 

[Mav3rick07]

The only penalty called on the Ducks was the Despres one. The rest, ticky tack or not, it happens, and Vatanen's especially can't be argued. Other than the call on Despres, I'm mostly upset that they put their whistles away for the Flames and only the Flames in the third. Absolutely hate the idea of the score affecting the way the game is called.

That Vaatanen play was horrendous and whoever took the penalty for Anaheim in OT(I forget) is an idiot, just basically punched Hudler in the face, they have to call that.

With that being said, the coincidental minors after Stajan running the netminder was BS, same with the missed trip in over-time.

Sucks when refs control the outcome. Lets hope game 4 is different.

 

[Kanye]

https://vine.co/v/eZdKE0d53O9

No it doesn't.

Doesn't matter, still won.

 

[Mobiandi]

I'm not even sure why this disallowed goal is still being argued. No matter how you try to spin it or argue it, no one can be proven correct. Otherwise the fellows in Toronto wouldn't have told the refs that there was inconclusive evidence to support overturning the call on the ice