Sell at the dead line(trade Michalek and don't trade for Hemsky), don't sign Michalek, tell Phillips its a 1 year deal or he's retiring, and sign Da Costa.
Not a single significant trade but I think we'd better off with this happening instead.
You could be right, but I don't think Michalek for Da Costa would make the team that much better.
The current reality is the top six hasn't produced consistently enough, the young D is still learning and the veterans in the bottom six have been average IMO.
This suggests adding a forward or two to improve on one or more of Turris, MacArthur, Ryan, Zibanejad, Hoffman, Chaisson, and/or Stone.
To make this happen it means moving/waiving one or two of the bottom six, Neil, Michalek, Legwand, Condra or Smith. IMO these players aren't going to bring a top six forward in return.
So unless Murray is willing to move youth there is no easy solution other than draft well and be patient.
On defense, same thing applies IMO.
Phillips is a problem only because MacLean plays him too much and at the same time sits Cowen/Wiercoich. The D is young, needs time to mature and IMO should be playing now since this team isn't ready to compete.
So again, unless Murray is willing to move youth the only answer is to be patient.
I believe Murray signed Michalek and Legwand because they were available at the price point he could afford and because the organization didn't want to risk going all in with youth.
Would Pageau be a better option than Legwand, certainly looks like that could be the case now, but this decision was made in the summer. Same could be said about Puempel over Michalek.
The Phillips decision was probably made with the thinking his experience and mentorship was invaluable, but his ice time would probably be reduced.
Watching this team play can be frustrating knowing a player or two could make then a very solid playoff group, but getting what they need isn't as simple as some would like to suggest.
BTW doing nothing is a decision and in many cases the right decision.