JaegerDice
The mark of my dignity shall scar thy DNA
- Dec 26, 2014
- 25,207
- 9,461
More than most teams or fans would want to give up, less than most Chicago fans think those teams should have to give up.
If you’re trading for Kane there would be no top 10 protectionFrom the habs :
Drouin + Hudon + Peohlin/Suzuki + 1 pick 2019 (top 10 protected) vs Kane.
No thanks. Leafs do not need to make a move like this for a winger. If we are gutting the future, it better be for a 1D.Ok just for fun:
Nylander
Marleau
Liljegren
2019 + 2020 1st
Well, not many teams can afford him. Look at the return for ROR/Karlsson.
I think a 2 firsts, 1 second, A prospect, B prospect+cap dumps could be a winning bid if you’re rebuilding.
f*** no.What about this
Tor- Subban
Chicago- Nylander, fiala/tolvenen , Zaitsev, Nashville 2019 2nd, Tor 2019 3rd
Nash- Kane, Liljengren
The cellies post top shelf between Austin and Patrick would be taken to the next level.
The answer remains no.
That offer is the very definition of gutting the future.
The Leafs don't have a problem scoring and don't need to gut the future for a player of Kane's calibre.
Look to the Habs for a trading partner for Kane.
For what Kane and his organization thinks hes worth, yall can just keep him. The man is 30. But I would be willing to make a horrible trade for him just to see Bowman out after the city of Chicago riots and burns down
Never discount Kanes value . Toronto and it's current players have never won a cup or went deep into the playoffs to truly understand what it takes to win the cup, Kanes experience and ability to produce in high stakes games as well as playing lots of minutes makes him more of a needed player then Tavares or Matthews.
Kane is hands down a top 5 player in the league every team in the league would be wanting to acquire him , at 30 years old producing 89 plus points and a game breaker . His trade value would be through the roof for everything he has accomplished and brings to the table and no signs of slowing Down. Stan would be fired .
If his linemates could finish he'd still be a 100 pt player.
Start with the Rick Nash trade and triple it.....Start with the Rick Nash trade and then add another good prospect. So something like a prime aged 2nd line forward or middle pair D, a young top-9 forward with top-6 upside, 2 good+ prospects and a 1st rounder for Kane.
Since Arizona and Chicago love trading with each other, I'll use them as an example with pretending everyone is healthy: Kane for Dvorak, Fischer, Hayton, Joseph/Capobiano and a 1st. So basically, it would gut any team's future pool.
McDavid doesn't need linemates that can finish to be a 100pt player.
Along with Seabrook and Keith, no sense in piecemealing this thangYou trade both if you can.
Along with Seabrook and Keith, no sense in piecemealing this thang
Is this a McDavid thread?
For what Kane and his organization thinks hes worth, yall can just keep him. The man is 30. But I would be willing to make a horrible trade for him just to see Bowman out after the city of Chicago riots and burns down
Well let's give this a shot...
Chicago gives up - Patty Kane!!!(9M/1.5M retained)
Calgary gives up- Andersson or Valimaki + 1st in 19 + 2nd in 21 + Neal(5.75M/Salary reasons) + Bennett/Jankowski + Stone(3.5M and ends next year) + 2nd in 20(if Stone is in the deal) + 2 conditional 1st's if the Flames win the cup in any of the first 5 seasons Kane is here