Value of: Patrick Kane at the trade deadline

[Coach Parker]

I'd love to see Kane get traded. It would be amazing to see. Not a shot at Hawks fans, I'd feel the same way about a lot of stars, including some Sharks if our season goes sour.

I'd like to make an offer, but I don't think we have the expendable pieces. They'd want Hertl++, which we can't do.

I think you're starting to see the NHL fanbase transition to a league where teams want to see the stars traded and new faces wearing their team jerseys.

 

[SotasicA]

Id say from Boston:

2019 1st Unprotected
D Charlie McAvoy
RW Anders Bjork
RW David Backes (2 more years at 6.0 million)

McAvoy is the real prize as the future #1 D for Chicago (hell, he's already the Bruins #1), local ND graduate Bjork and this years 1st. Chicago drops Bjork into Kane's spot and accelerates the rebuild with McAvoy, the 1st and Bjork.

That's not a bad offer, and I can see why Backes would make sense cap-wise... but damn, seeing him wear the Indian Head would not make me happy. He has fought Toews more than once, too. That'd be so weird. McAvoy is a good piece and value is fair.

 

[b in vancouver]

Id say from Boston:

2019 1st Unprotected
D Charlie McAvoy
RW Anders Bjork
RW David Backes (2 more years at 6.0 million)

McAvoy is the real prize as the future #1 D for Chicago (hell, he's already the Bruins #1), local ND graduate Bjork and this years 1st. Chicago drops Bjork into Kane's spot and accelerates the rebuild with McAvoy, the 1st and Bjork.

I was trying to think of a proposal without McAvoy. It's tough. And I usually suck at trades.

Krug - another piece the Hawks could move at the deadline (cap)
Carlo - building block RHD
One of Donato, Bjork, Heinen or Studnicka
One of JFK, Cehlarik, Senyshyn or Hughes

I honestly have no idea. The Cap hit is just tough but the player is amazing and exactly what the Bruins need. Then hopefully deal with Backes in the summer.

 

[Esq]

He's not going anywhere.

 

[ricky0034]

I feel like it would be pretty dumb to trade him at the deadline

could probably get a lot more for him during the offseason

not that he's getting traded anyways

 

[Drew311]

Nylander, Liljegren and Zaitsev.

 

[Soundgarden]

Imo it starts with Fiala, they add Tolvanen and first.

Add in Bonino for cap issues and I'd probably do it. Although...it is Patrick Kane.

 

[Flamesjustwin]

Frolik, Lindholm, Valimaki, 2019 1st for Kane.

 

[justafan22]

Which teams would he waive his NMC to?

 

[Bobbybruins]

I will try my luck.

To Chicago:
Torrey Krug
David Backes
Jakob Zboril
Zach Senyshyn
One of Ryan Donato/Danton Heinen
Noel Acciari, just because he's useless in Boston

To Boston:
Patrick Kane
Dylan Strome

I was trying to think of a proposal without McAvoy. It's tough. And I usually suck at trades.

Krug - another piece the Hawks could move at the deadline (cap)
Carlo - building block RHD
One of Donato, Bjork, Heinen or Studnicka
One of JFK, Cehlarik, Senyshyn or Hughes

I honestly have no idea. The Cap hit is just tough but the player is amazing and exactly what the Bruins need. Then hopefully deal with Backes in the summer.

 

[Gaylord Q Tinkledink]

If the hawks were to trade him he would get more during the off season.

More teams. More players able to be moved. At the deadline teams won't really want to move roster players that Chicago would actually want. Not because he's not worth it, but to retain depth.

 

[Toews2Bickell]

kane is going nowhere, hawks are going to rebound hard if they get Hughes or Kakko

 

[Toews2Bickell]

I will try my luck.

To Chicago:
Torrey Krug
David Backes
Jakob Zboril
Zach Senyshyn
One of Ryan Donato/Danton Heinen
Noel Acciari, just because he's useless in Boston

To Boston:
Patrick Kane
Dylan Strome

so basically a bag of shit for Kane...solid offer

 

[Toews2Bickell]

Id say from Boston:

2019 1st Unprotected
D Charlie McAvoy
RW Anders Bjork
RW David Backes (2 more years at 6.0 million)

McAvoy is the real prize as the future #1 D for Chicago (hell, he's already the Bruins #1), local ND graduate Bjork and this years 1st. Chicago drops Bjork into Kane's spot and accelerates the rebuild with McAvoy, the 1st and Bjork.

McAvoy is really good obv but the Hawks already have 3 top 4 defenseman in Boqvist, Jokiharju and Ian Mitchell coming as soon as next year...Hawks don't need D, they need top 6 forwards..so why trade your best one and one of the best in the league...

 

[SotasicA]

If the hawks were to trade him he would get more during the off season.

More teams. More players able to be moved. At the deadline teams won't really want to move roster players that Chicago would actually want. Not because he's not worth it, but to retain depth.

But he's a playoff performer, so why not get him for the run? He will be an upgrade over the roster player you give up. GM's get greedy at the deadline with the prospect of a Cup.

Also, there will be competition in the off-season. Teams will look at UFA's before turning to trade options.

 

[SotasicA]

Frolik, Lindholm, Valimaki, 2019 1st for Kane.

Hawks can probably do better, but will Stan be able to resist reuniting Frolik and Kruger?!

Speaking of the Flames, Sam Bennett also seems like the kind of redemption project Stan Bowman likes to acquire.

 

[tictactoe]

deleted

 

[Finnish your Czech]

Kane at 50% retained would be a huge asset and could basically kickstart a very nice rebuild for Chicago. 4.5 years of term left on the contract is a lot to bite for Chicago to retain for so it would never happen.

 

[SotasicA]

Kane at 50% retained would be a huge asset and could basically kickstart a very nice rebuild for Chicago. 4.5 years of term left on the contract is a lot to bite for Chicago to retain for so it would never happen.

For the right price, anything can happen.

But is there a big enough piece to warrant that kind of retainment? It'd have to be for another franchise player. I wouldn't retain that much for a Tarasenko, for instance. So... even better, or younger.

 

[Toews2Bickell]

Kane at 50% retained would be a huge asset and could basically kickstart a very nice rebuild for Chicago. 4.5 years of term left on the contract is a lot to bite for Chicago to retain for so it would never happen.

Hawks aren't retaining on Kane. If guys like Duchene and Skinner are asking for 9+ then Kane is a steal at 10.5 with term...Hawks rebuild is well on its way and they should land a top 5 pick this year and a top 6 forward in free agency...

 

[SotasicA]

Hawks rebuild is well on its way

You keep telling yourself that.

 

[Toews2Bickell]

You keep telling yourself that.

keep telling yourself Kane is going to be traded...you've probably watched like 3 hawks game in 5 years, i'm sure you have a really good sense for where they are in the rebuild

 

[SotasicA]

you've probably watched like 3 hawks game in 5 years,

I've watched 3 in the last 5 days that I wish I hadn't.

 

[Mrfenn92]

If the hawks and Kane ever got to that point, it would make more sense to do in the offseason. He still has to agree to the destination and hawks have to find an acceptable package.
Highly unlikely the hawks trade Kane at all. And I don't think Kane will ever ask for a trade.

 

[ole ole]

Kotkaniemi?

NO!