Pat Lafontaine resigns position with team

Status
Not open for further replies.

dotcommunism

Moderator
Aug 16, 2007
5,182
3,348
Tough to fit into any type of management team when you don't respect other people's views and think you are the almighty.

The guy didn't want to be labeled a GM, but wanted the power of a GM.

Doing that allows him to miss all blame, but take all responsibility for success.

You're right, I'm sure this is exactly like popular Netflix original series House of Cards
 

Beerz

Registered User
Jun 28, 2011
35,578
11,324
Great news.... The Chicken Wing is moving into the Golden Age...


t9v0u9.jpg
 

BloFan4Life

Registered User
Jul 8, 2009
4,078
938
NY
:laugh:



And he was promised it and given it!

What the heck are you talking about?!?!

He frickin hired a GM because he didn't think he was ready to do the job. What he really meant was that he didn't want to take the negatives when things go bad, but wants to control everything anyways.

So let's say Pat is still President. Draft comes and Pat insists that Ekblad is the pick. Murray thinks Reinhart should be the pick. Pat tells him he is higher up and Ekblad is the pick. 3 years later Ekblad sucks, Reinhart is a star and Murray is fired by Pat because he missed on such a big pick.

The GM takes the blame for so many thing he has no control of.
 

Paxon

202* Stanley Cup Champions
Jul 13, 2003
29,005
5,177
Rochester, NY
Tough to fit into any type of management team when you don't respect other people's views and think you are the almighty.

The guy didn't want to be labeled a GM, but wanted the power of a GM.

Doing that allows him to miss all blame, but take all responsibility for success.

Actually he wanted to be President of Hockey Operations and have the power of that position. In other words, he didn't want the daily hands on job of GM but he wanted to oversee the GM and be able to overrule him on big decisions. That's hardly contradictory. It would have been bad to allow a guy with no experience that sort of power but we already know Pegula offered him that sort of power because Pegula offered him the GM job. We also know that LaFontaine was under the impression that he had final say on all hockey matters, because he said so in interviews, so it's reasonable to think Pegula led him to being under that impression.

This situation is nothing like the Islanders one. Pretty much everyone except for the ridiculous clown Mike Milbury understands that LaFontaine walked away from what was a ridiculous situation. Wang hired Neil Smith and LaFontaine after the season and then fired Smith a couple months later because Wang was hard for Garth Snow.
 

enthusiast

cybersabre his prophet
Oct 20, 2009
18,674
5,998
What the heck are you talking about?!?!

He frickin hired a GM because he didn't think he was ready to do the job. What he really meant was that he didn't want to take the negatives when things go bad, but wants to control everything anyways.

So let's say Pat is still President. Draft comes and Pat insists that Ekblad is the pick. Murray thinks Reinhart should be the pick. Pat tells him he is higher up and Ekblad is the pick. 3 years later Ekblad sucks, Reinhart is a star and Murray is fired by Pat because he missed on such a big pick.

The GM takes the blame for so many thing he has no control of.

Aside from hypotheticals I'm saying Terry promised him the final say. He lost it at some point and quit because he didn't want the position in that sense of agency. It's a reasonable and understandable response.
 

slip

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 19, 2005
16,140
4,701
People defending LaFontaine need to read this article.

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304023504577319912036433148

Patty has some serous personal issues that he needs to fix.

What issues are you referring to? His crime on the Island appears to be bailing on Wang after Wang bailed on Smith a measly 6 weeks into his hire. What owner hires and fires the same GM in less than two months? Clearly a guy who has no ****ing clue what he's doing, which has proven to be spot on in Wang's case. I love how the article culls this quote from Milbury:

LaFontaine elected to step down after failing to persuade Wang to reconsider, he said—not necessarily out of loyalty to Smith, but out of concern for the franchise's direction. "I believe you treat people fairly," he said, "and stand up for what you believe in."

Through a team spokesman, Wang declined to comment on the situation. "Pat LaFontaine had a great NHL career and does a lot for the Long Island community," Wang said in a statement. "We wish him all the best." Snow declined to comment through a spokesman.

Former Islanders general manager Mike Milbury, who was a member of the team's board of governors when LaFontaine resigned, said he would understand if Wang still held a grudge against LaFontaine.

"Pat ran for the hills. Pat ran for cover," said Milbury, now an NHL analyst for NBC. "It was cowardly, and it was terrible. And if Charles was [ticked], I wouldn't blame him in the least." LaFontaine declined to respond to Milbury's comments.

Milbury's epic toolness aside, I don't see how Lafontaine can be faulted for questioning his desire to be a part of Wang's gross mismanagement -- oh the irony of the Milbury's moral tirade against Lafontaine, as if it was Patty who traded away Chara and not Milbury, the original shoe bomber, himself -- of the Islanders, and immediately cutting ties. He might not be able to run a franchise, but sure as hell can spot when it's being run into the ground. Don't forget Mike, sometimes the guys who run for cover survive to fight another day.
 

BloFan4Life

Registered User
Jul 8, 2009
4,078
938
NY

enthusiast

cybersabre his prophet
Oct 20, 2009
18,674
5,998
Unless he's developing concussions in the community you just made it up. Don't lie.
 

BloFan4Life

Registered User
Jul 8, 2009
4,078
938
NY
Aside from hypotheticals I'm saying Terry promised him the final say. He lost it at some point and quit because he didn't want the position in that sense of agency. It's a reasonable and understandable response.

He lost it when he hired a GM. No GM is going to let someone else build their team. Sorry not happening.
 

slip

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 19, 2005
16,140
4,701
A BS job...


It appears that the former NHL star’s duties are as cloudy as his job description, as he’ll work in a “variety of capacities†for the likes of Brendan Shanahan and Bill Daly, according to McKenzie.

http://prohockeytalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/01/pat-lafontaine-just-started-a-new-gig-with-the-nhl/

Great, just what we need: a bitter Lafontaine chirping into Shanaban's ear. We're so suspended before the puck even drops.
 

BloFan4Life

Registered User
Jul 8, 2009
4,078
938
NY
Unless he's developing concussions in the community you just made it up. Don't lie.

I didn't make it up. I had discussion with Pat himself about his role in the NHL. Pat was very busy in youth hockey and preventing concussions. He was approached by Bettman to do some work with concussions in the NHL.
 

dotcommunism

Moderator
Aug 16, 2007
5,182
3,348
Great, just what we need: a bitter Lafontaine chirping into Shanaban's ear. We're so suspended before the puck even drops.

Alternate theory: this is all an elaborate ruse. Fake LaFontaine's falling out with the Sabres organization so he can return to the NHL office and meticulously influence events in the favor of the Sabres without anyone being any the wiser...

Connor McDavid here we come
 

Karate Johnson*

Guest
Seriously. What GM would ever agree to come on board with that sort of setup?

It's an impossible setup to operate a hockey team under.

There has to be a guy who makes the decisions and it has to be all the decisions. You can't have Murray doing GM stuff, but for a big decision, like Miller or Nolan, LaFontaine has final say?


Despite people joking on twitter, we are in much better shape than we were 24 hours ago, knowing now the problem we were going to have.
 

Karate Johnson*

Guest
Alternate theory: this is all an elaborate ruse. Fake LaFontaine's falling out with the Sabres organization so he can return to the NHL office and meticulously influence events in the favor of the Sabres without anyone being any the wiser...

Connor McDavid here we come

Do you guys want to operate under this assumption when posting on the main boards? If we all stick to this story and use it whenever this situation comes up, eventually it will become true.
 

slip

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 19, 2005
16,140
4,701
Seriously. What GM would ever agree to come on board with that sort of setup?

Don't know who would come on board, but I know one GM that would submit to that kind of management structure, Jay Feaster:

CALGARY -- After a lengthy search to add an executive to the hockey operations department, the Calgary Flames had one name at the top of their list: Brian Burke.

Burke was named president of hockey operations during a press conference at Scotiabank Saddledome on Thursday, earning the new position after beating out a field of about 60 candidates.

"It's a very proud day for me to join the Calgary Flames," Burke said. "It's a great city, it's a great hockey market, great ownership group, great alumni group, and I just couldn't be more pleased to be here today."

Burke will report to Flames president and COO Ken King. General manager Jay Feaster will handle the day-to-day transactions of the department and will report to Burke.
Collectively, Burke and Feaster will head the on-ice brain trust of the Flames.

http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=681495

I wonder if Patty didn't have something like this in mind when he signed up for the job?
 

Paxon

202* Stanley Cup Champions
Jul 13, 2003
29,005
5,177
Rochester, NY
He lost it when he hired a GM. No GM is going to let someone else build their team. Sorry not happening.

This is illogical. If we accept that Pegula hired him to have final say yet not be GM, why would hiring a GM change that? It obviously would not have implied LaFontaine working as President of Hockey Operations without a GM, because that would just make him the GM.

Whether you think it makes sense or not, LaFontaine was clearly under the impression that he had final say and could overrule the GM. All relevant evidence and contextual clues point to Pegula putting LaFontaine under that impression. If you find it ridiculous, then you simply find the position he was hired to fill and the situation Pegula created ridicuous.
 

Beerz

Registered User
Jun 28, 2011
35,578
11,324
This is illogical. If we accept that Pegula hired him to have final say yet not be GM, why would hiring a GM change that? It obviously would not have implied LaFontaine working as President of Hockey Operations without a GM, because that would just make him the GM.

Whether you think it makes sense or not, LaFontaine was clearly under the impression that he had final say and could overrule the GM. All relevant evidence and contextual clues point to Pegula putting LaFontaine under that impression. If you find it ridiculous, then you simply find the position he was hired to fill and the situation Pegula created ridicuous.

We don't accept that Pegula gave Patty final say. The only time Patty had final say was when their was a void in the GM position ... after Murray was hired Lafontaine himself stated it was Murrays call.
 

Karate Johnson*

Guest
Don't know who would come on board, but I know one GM that would submit to that kind of management structure, Jay Feaster:



http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=681495

I wonder if Patty didn't have something like this in mind when he signed up for the job?


Jay Feaster lasted 3 months in that setup before getting fired.


Also, something to think about. The 4 teams who had VP of Hockey Operations:

Buffalo
Calgary
Edmonton
Columbus

So it's probably best that we don't have one and be grouped with those teams.
 

Beerz

Registered User
Jun 28, 2011
35,578
11,324
Jay Feaster lasted 3 months in that setup before getting fired.


Also, something to think about. The 4 teams who had VP of Hockey Operations:

Buffalo
Calgary
Edmonton
Columbus

So it's probably best that we don't have one and be grouped with those teams.

Isn't Sakic one?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

  • Czechia vs Switzerland
    Czechia vs Switzerland
    Wagers: 6
    Staked: $1,214.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Sweden vs Germany
    Sweden vs Germany
    Wagers: 1
    Staked: $325.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Fiorentina vs Monza
    Fiorentina vs Monza
    Wagers: 4
    Staked: $20,305.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • Aston Villa vs Liverpool
    Aston Villa vs Liverpool
    Wagers: 6
    Staked: $10,352.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:
  • FC Barcelona vs Real Sociedad
    FC Barcelona vs Real Sociedad
    Wagers: 5
    Staked: $1,745.00
    Event closes
    • Updated:

Ad

Ad