Shea Theodore isnt late in his progression. He had been buried on a stacked prospect pool in Anaheim and behind established guys like Fowler. Subban accelerated his development because Markov was MIA for multiple seasons and he was our only top D prospect. Subban, if circumstances were similar to Theodore, would have had a slower track. Theodore is only 22. Subban at 22 still only had 36 points in 81 games. Theodore had 29 pts in 61 games. Theodore is also capable of those Hail Mary passes Subban used.
Theodore is good but will never reach Subban's level. AND the point is that Pacioretty got contribution from NORRIS SUBBAN, not sophomore or rookie Subban (except for the sophomore season, where he had Hamr AND Cole). You use very weak points of comparison that have nothing to do with what happened last season, and what happened with Mac between 2012 and 2018.
And I'll repeat for this to be clear. YOUR ARGUMENT ABOUT VEGAS's TOP THREE IS IRRELEVANT as TATAR WAS RECEIVING CONTRIBUTION FROM THE 2nd AND MOSTLY 3rd PAIRING. POINT FINAL. Your comparison is ****.
Dmen don't produce more because of system.
Yes, they do. Please stop replying to me if you're denying this, especially with Vegas which was one of the most highly systemized teams I have ever seen.
Making good point shots and outlet passes are something that is immaterial to systems, which tells players where to be on the ice.
Completely ridiculous. Weaker players will often produce better in a systemized system, because their passes or shots are not just out of the blue. Systemized approach relegates creativity, for a process of pre-established choices.
Dmen will always be in the back, needing to make passes to get things done. Some might pinch more depending on system, but no system can compensate processing the game. Especially when there is cannibalizing amongst themselves since there's not enough icetime to spread to all three of them.
I meant collectively.
I doesn't matter ONE IOTA. BECAUSE TATAR ISNT MARCHESSAULT OR NEAL. TATAR PLAYED 3rd LINE MINUTES.
Petry finally hit 40 because he was the only guy left. But he always had more flash than substance. Plays die because he doesn't process the game fast enough. One aberration doesn't compensate for years of mediocrity on offense.
?????? Man, I'm talking about Petry getting 30 points per when Markov and Subban were here. You took Vegas 3 dmen to compare with 2 DMEN? There's something that doesn't seem to compute in your brain.
You give me Vegas's top 3 with 107 points
You compare that to Markov and Subban's 110 points
Don't you see the fallacy here????
You're wrong and instead of y'know, being mature and say, well, right, If I add Petry, who was always close to 30 points, which isn't far off from what the 4 top players on Vegas's D squad got, and incidently, puts Montreal's top 3, the ones feeding Pac, at 150 points compared to Vegas's 107 points.
And ADD to the fact that Tatar was not the recipient of the performance of Vegas's top 3.
Nope, instead you go into reason to not include Petry. That's what would call bias and cherry picking.
Please don't reply. You're completely irrational.
And I'll state one last time: TATAR PLAYED 3RD LINE MINUTES AND GOT LITTLE CONTRIBUTION FROM THE 3 PLAYERS YOU COMPARED.