You can tell from Max’s interview with Pierre Lebrun on the athletic that he was over being captain and having to answer questions about the success of the team, “I had a gun pointed to my head and I took it” and also saying he thinks he was blamed too much for stuff that happened.
Pretty much confirms what I’ve thought about him always. Not captain material. Too sensitive and not a team player.
Additionally, his responses re: asking for a trade and saying maybe it was misinterpreted clearly points towards he had conversations re: not wanting to be there anymore, not having the captaincy/blame or wanting out if there was a rebuild.
I say good riddance and look forward to the next chapter.
Any link to the interview? Tried to find it without much success.
Any link to the interview? Tried to find it without much success.
I knew they would suck. I would have added something from our end to make it a 1st instead of a second. It would probably be top 10 protected, but still.imagine if Vegas would have put a 1st pick and not a 2nd pick in the Pacioretty trade !!
I'm sure McPhee was aware of that potential as well.I knew they would suck. I would have added something from our end to make it a 1st instead of a second. It would probably be top 10 protected, but still.
I wouldn't be surprised to learn that a 1st was part of the package Bergy was looking for initially but then Suzuki being on the table changed everything. GmGm may not have done a 1st AND Suzuki type deal unless we put Mete on the table as well or something similar. From what we've learned since the trade, getting Suzuki was really the objective all along.I knew they would suck. I would have added something from our end to make it a 1st instead of a second. It would probably be top 10 protected, but still.
Agree it was probably a 1st or Suzuki and never both.I wouldn't be surprised to learn that a 1st was part of the package Bergy was looking for initially but then Suzuki being on the table changed everything. GmGm may not have done a 1st AND Suzuki type deal unless we put Mete on the table as well or something similar. From what we've learned since the trade, getting Suzuki was really the objective all along.
I'm sure McPhee was aware of that potential as well.
Teams now will no longer trade firsts without protection. So that first would be deferred if Vegas continues to suck or a bottom 15 pick if they bounce back. Suzuki was the smarter asset to trade for, easily.imagine if Vegas would have put a 1st pick and not a 2nd pick in the Pacioretty trade !!
Imagine if they gave us a prospect on pace for 55 goalsimagine if Vegas would have put a 1st pick and not a 2nd pick in the Pacioretty trade !!
I would have preferred that over Tatar+2nd.imagine if Vegas would have put a 1st pick and not a 2nd pick in the Pacioretty trade !!
imagine if Vegas would have put a 1st pick and not a 2nd pick in the Pacioretty trade !!
We gave up **** and got back 3 great pieces. There are many other moves from this summer that have me what ifing.
Imagine Bergevin had half a brain and took Duclair and Perron up on their interest to play in Montreal and actually at the very least submitted them an offer.
Imagine Beregevin said hey look Skinner is available for a measly 2nd, it's great that I've added character, but let me also consider adding some offensive talent for a quarter of a second.
I just got 4th liner Armia in a cap dump, why not get Sheary too.
Imagine if I don't give up Galchenyuk in the Domi trade because I want him gone, maybe then we won't have one of the worst power plays in the league.
What do you give for Domi if not Galchenyuk?
I doubt they were looking for quantity in that sort of deal.
Glad we gave up Galchenyuk then lolI think Poehling, an early 2nd, and a roster player (Lehkonen, Shaw, Hudon, Scherbak, Armia) gets it done.
I think Poehling, an early 2nd, and a roster player (Lehkonen, Shaw, Hudon, Scherbak, Armia) gets it done.
I guess we'll never know.
As of right now I don't think anyone can complain about that trade.
I agree with that. My complaint is with Bergevin clearly not valueing Galchneyuk, not trying him at center in a lost season, and wanting him out.
Glad we gave up Galchenyuk then lol
3 goal in 14 games.. Bergy was right...lol
I’d much rather have Poehling on a ELC than 2 years of Galchenyuk at 5.5 before he splits, that’s for sure. Not to mention the 2nd and Lehkonen or whoever....You think Poehling will be better than Galchenyuk?
Yes because 14 games is a large enough sample size to ascertain that...