If Tampa wins the cup, they'll do something impossible which is have a winger as its best player. Except Washington of course.... Aaaand Chicago.
I think we can put that theory to rest. You can build around a winger as long as you have depth and multiple top talent. Your center doesnt have to be your best player.
If Tampa wins the cup, they'll do something impossible which is have a winger as its best player. Except Washington of course.... Aaaand Chicago.
I think we can put that theory to rest. You can build around a winger as long as you have depth and multiple top talent. Your center doesnt have to be your best player.
If Tampa wins the cup, they'll do something impossible which is have a winger as its best player. Except Washington of course.... Aaaand Chicago.
I think we can put that theory to rest. You can build around a winger as long as you have depth and multiple top talent. Your center doesnt have to be your best player.
If Tampa wins the cup, they'll do something impossible which is have a winger as its best player. Except Washington of course.... Aaaand Chicago.
I think we can put that theory to rest. You can build around a winger as long as you have depth and multiple top talent. Your center doesnt have to be your best player.
Brutal post...those wingers need centers like Stamkos, Point, Toews, Backstrom, Kuzy.
Kucherov is their best player, but the team's central pillar is still with Stamkos, Point and Johnson manning the middle. Same with Washington having Backstrom, Kuznetsov and, to a lesser extent, Eller.
Tampa, Washington, and Chicago all had top notch centres to surround those wingers too.
Of course. Chicago had one. Their third best forward was another winger. I never said or implied you can ice a **** team and center line with an elite winger. I've heard, many times, you can't build your team around a winger as your best player. It's patently false. You can. Its all about how you build the rest of your team, but theres no set formula.
Brutal post...those wingers need centers like Stamkos, Point, Toews, Backstrom, Kuzy to perform at the level their currently performing at.
You just have to have a winger that is a top 5-10 NHL player as your winger to build around.
That is what Kucherov, Kane, and Ovechkin are.
Sportsnet chose to use a NESN feed for the BOS@SJS game instead of going with the NBCSN one.
Interwebs to the rescue!
I don't even mind Edwards all that much, but the clown AKA Brickley is someone I could not stomach.Sportsnet does that for every Bruins game they televise. I've never heard the other teams announcers on Sportsnet when they show the B's.
Old man Chara scores. 2-0 B's.
I don't even mind Edwards all that much, but the clown AKA Brickley is someone I could not stomach.
drafted 58th overall..who did we pick before him..lol
Nick Suzuki gets his 39th assist.
Ironically enough the exact same thing has happened with me over time.I hear ya. I could stomach Brick at one time and not Edwards but now I'm with you regarding Brick. The guy just irritates me now for some reason. Jack is fine when he sticks to just calling the game. It's when he goes full Bruins homer that he gets nauseating to listen to.
From the Q, imagine that, Trevor.