Beezeral
Registered User
- Mar 1, 2010
- 9,900
- 4,773
I was showing him how your argument is correct because like you said, every team has a chance.Lol you again...Thought you would have learned from the last time .....
I was showing him how your argument is correct because like you said, every team has a chance.Lol you again...Thought you would have learned from the last time .....
Sure you were doing this...Lol still mad about me calling you out about talking in absolutes and being proved right about your team again huh...What happened again ???Or yes you werent as good because you had injuries......Just as I said was wrong with our team previous...I was showing him how your argument is correct because like you said, every team has a chance.
I think the bolded names should suffice
So Stone playing more than 50 games??Or maybe EK not skating on one leg after an full healthy offseason...For Ottawa to become the next Colarado they need to emulate the strategy of having your 50 point forward turn into a top 5 forward in the league overnight.
Mark Stone played 58 gamesSo Stone playing more than 50 games??Or maybe EK not skating on one leg after an full healthy offseason...
Cool ,and was over a PPG pace....Think him scoring 80 or so wouldnt help??Mark Stone played 58 games
Sure, when he is either your 1st or 2nd line winger, he isn't. That's what he is for the Sens, he's taking Hoffman's spot in the lineup.I want to like this post but Boedker is honestly more than adequate as a 3rd line playmaking winger.
Meh ,would like to see one of the kids get the ice first..Or Dzingle,but yes he should be somewhere in the top 9Sure, when he is either your 1st or 2nd line winger, he isn't. That's what he is for the Sens, he's taking Hoffman's spot in the lineup.
Sure, when he is either your 1st or 2nd line winger, he isn't. That's what he is for the Sens, he's taking Hoffman's spot in the lineup.
Which again is another reason it's so bad. ThBut in that projected lineup, he is on the 3rd line.
So basically you just got super triggered at something that even dared to remind you of the possibility they won't.Blah blah blah,the end result would be the exact same...Ottawa can rebound ,its not like they are devoid of talent ...Both at the nhl level and at the prospect level....I know its hard to believe but teams and players can have bad years followed by good ones
Has EK said if he'll report to camp in Ottawa if he's not traded?
I really want to know what was going through OP's head when he looked at that roster thought "this is pretty good!" and then proceeded to post about in on the main boards for everyone to laugh at.
not mad about anything. I was showing him the evidence behind your point.Sure you were doing this...Lol still mad about me calling you out about talking in absolutes and being proved right about your team again huh...What happened again ???Or yes you werent as good because you had injuries......Just as I said was wrong with our team previous...
What point???My team was beat up and had tons of issues,but it does have some good pieces in the lineup and a few kids that could make an impact....Just as every other potential bubble teamnot mad about anything. I was showing him the evidence behind your point.
For Ottawa to become the next Colarado they need to emulate the strategy of having your 50 point forward turn into a top 5 forward in the league overnight.
yup. which is why I showed numerical evidence that the Sens do in fact have a chance at making the playoffs.What point???My team was beat up and had tons of issues,but it does have some good pieces in the lineup and a few kids that could make an impact....Just as every other potential bubble team