Confirmed Trade: [OTT/CBJ] Duchene and Bergman for Abramov, Davidson, 1st, and Conditional 1st - Part 2

Kakko Schmakko

Registered User
Feb 24, 2018
5,033
1,569
Their great haul was getting saddled with Spooner and Beleskey lol

Spooner was going to be an RFA and was a positive asset at the time and Beleskey was 50% retained. So Beleskey buried in AHL is only about 1 mil cap hit.

Spooner had a great finish to last season and would have brought a decent return if traded before they re-signed him to overpriced contract. In the end he got us Strome who has been very solid for us.

I think Beleskey will get to play more next season still a solid player and will possibly be traded closer to the deadline for something.
 

Karl Eriksson

Boring!
Apr 12, 2007
10,930
5,672
Ottawa
Not a bad deal on its own merits. If you start to account for sunk cost past trades then you have to account for what it cost to get Turris, which was a song.
 

Kakko Schmakko

Registered User
Feb 24, 2018
5,033
1,569
Not a bad deal on its own merits. If you start to account for sunk cost past trades then you have to account for what it cost to get Turris, which was a song.

I think you are contradicting yourself. Who cares what they paid for Turris. Turris was a high draft pick, but he never lived up to the expectations.
 

grindline

Registered User
Mar 29, 2013
305
18
England
I keep reading the same couple of things that are factually wrong and it is probably the time to clarify them.

1. Columbus is not about to enter a rebuild. Yes Panarin and Bobrovsky are leaving but the roster is not a bunch of AHLers without them. Many of the best players still have room for growth (Dubois, Jones). Some people seem to have failed to notice the Islanders are top of their division after Tavares walked so it is not as simple as ‘lose a great player...get worse’. Plus we are not likely to want Bob on the contract that he wants, which is why we have not been sending him offers like we have with Panarin.

2. Buying Duchene does not automatically mean keeping
Panarin. If we trade Panarin for equal to what we used in the Duchene trade, then we have rebalanced our forwards by swapping a wing for a centre (as well as giving us a player far more likely to resign). Yes Panarin is a better player than Duchene but it isn’t like we got rid of Gretzky and brought in Zach Kassian as his replacement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: shello and jaeger

jonlin

Registered User
Nov 11, 2011
5,904
5,432
Bold move by Jarmo. I think its a great trade for Columbus. Now they are ready for a playoff-run.
 

BelovedIsles

Registered User
Oct 22, 2005
20,536
5,765
This should, once again, be a reminder to all. You do not acquire bluechippers w rentals, unless there’s an anomaly GM.

Modest return for Ottawa. They’ll get a 15-20 first rounder. Unless they strike gold again, aka EK in the mid first, this pick won’t materialize into anything close to Duchene. Secondly, they didn’t return an A level prospect.

More proof that rentals don’t cost as much as fans think. Who knows, good chance he re-signs. IMHO, if you are in the playoff mix, more often than not, it’s better to augment. Most of the picks or prospects don’t materialize into much compared to the player you just acquired.
 

Frenzy31

Registered User
May 21, 2003
7,208
2,020
I think this is a ballsy move by the Jackets. It likely raises the return for Bread and it means they can compete and not have to trade him for scraps.
 

The don godfather

Registered User
Jul 5, 2018
19,059
20,072
Woodbridge Ontario
This should, once again, be a reminder to all. You do not acquire bluechippers w rentals, unless there’s an anomaly GM.

Modest return for Ottawa. They’ll get a 15-20 first rounder. Unless they strike gold again, aka EK in the mid first, this pick won’t materialize into anything close to Duchene. Secondly, they didn’t return an A level prospect.

More proof that rentals don’t cost as much as fans think. Who knows, good chance he re-signs. IMHO, if you are in the playoff mix, more often than not, it’s better to augment. Most of the picks or prospects don’t materialize into much compared to the player you just acquired.
Yes I agree the prospects were not overwhelming to say the least. Dorion I'm sure tried but what I would have wanted was foudy instead of those 2. It should have been sweet and simple . Foudy and 1st round pick for duchene. That would have been a better more effective package of sens instead of getting maybe prospects. Foudy was the solid more upside blue chip .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Beville

DaStinger

Permanent Interim
Feb 14, 2007
4,863
1,244
NB, Canada
Spooner was going to be an RFA and was a positive asset at the time and Beleskey was 50% retained. So Beleskey buried in AHL is only about 1 mil cap hit.

Spooner had a great finish to last season and would have brought a decent return if traded before they re-signed him to overpriced contract. In the end he got us Strome who has been very solid for us.

I think Beleskey will get to play more next season still a solid player and will possibly be traded closer to the deadline for something.

If you think Beleskey is an NHL asset that will net anything other that a negative return I'd like you to come down to the beach with me and take a look at this sand I'm selling.
 

Avsboy

Registered User
Dec 12, 2006
32,243
16,657
Someone please start keeping track of the Matt Duchene spiderweb of trades. All of the pieces involved in his two trades and what they all turn into.

I sense the Sens' first will be the best out of everything, but I could be jinxing it.
 

Eso

Registered User
Oct 6, 2013
23
1
I dont really understand why Columbus did this. Outside of getting to a Conference final, you lose your now 3 best players to UFA and your first round pick. That is a lot for a team that still is imo in that 5-10 spot in the East.

The wise move would have been to trade Panarin and Bobs and have 3+ first round picks going into the draft.

They want to loose 3 top UFAs instead of 2. It's obivous, isn't it? Because loosing of Torts would make much sense... :)
 

SensFactor

Registered User
Oct 25, 2008
11,016
6,184
Ottawa
This should, once again, be a reminder to all. You do not acquire bluechippers w rentals, unless there’s an anomaly GM.

Modest return for Ottawa. They’ll get a 15-20 first rounder. Unless they strike gold again, aka EK in the mid first, this pick won’t materialize into anything close to Duchene. Secondly, they didn’t return an A level prospect.

More proof that rentals don’t cost as much as fans think. Who knows, good chance he re-signs. IMHO, if you are in the playoff mix, more often than not, it’s better to augment. Most of the picks or prospects don’t materialize into much compared to the player you just acquired.
Duchene is a rental and likely to walk especially when the blue jackets are either eliminated from the playoffs and or eliminated in the first round.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thrasymachus

JoemAvs

Registered User
Jul 2, 2011
13,671
4,116
Whatever happens to the Jackets it's nice to see them going for it

I disagree. I just believe the price is too high. Even if they somehow get out of their division, I don't think they would have much chance against whoever comes out of the Atlantic.
And that only if they keep all of Panarin, Bob and Duchene as rentals for the run. Too steep of a price IMO.

That said. I think the worst case scenario might just be Duchene re-signing with them while Bob and Panarin walk. That has the potential to lock them into mediocrity for another 5+ years (while costing them yet another 1st).
Not good enough to consistently make the playoffs or even threaten to win a round and not bad enough to ever get enough talent through the draft realistically to change it.

That was always a risk once Panarin and Bob had their feet out of the door but I worry that re-signing Duchene would only make it worse.

That said. Now that Duchenes performance has no impact on the Avs anymore, I wish him all the best. If the Jackets make it to the playoffs, I will probably pick them as my Eastern team and root for them to go as far as possible and for Duchene to light the world on fire and prove everyone wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thrasymachus

JT Kreider

FIRE GORDIE CLARK
Dec 24, 2010
16,903
15,464
NYC
I disagree. I just believe the price is too high. Even if they somehow get out of their division, I don't think they would have much chance against whoever comes out of the Atlantic.
And that only if they keep all of Panarin, Bob and Duchene as rentals for the run. Too steep of a price IMO.

That said. I think the worst case scenario might just be Duchene re-signing with them while Bob and Panarin walk. That has the potential to lock them into mediocrity for another 5+ years (while costing them yet another 1st).
Not good enough to consistently make the playoffs or even threaten to win a round and not bad enough to ever get enough talent through the draft realistically to change it.


That was always a risk once Panarin and Bob had their feet out of the door but I worry that re-signing Duchene would only make it worse.

That said. Now that Duchenes performance has no impact on the Avs anymore, I wish him all the best. If the Jackets make it to the playoffs, I will probably pick them as my Eastern team and root for them to go as far as possible and for Duchene to light the world on fire and prove everyone wrong.

Which is why I believe Jarmo included the second conditional pick to seal the deal. Dorion was probably hung up on it being included in the trade so he could use smoke and mirrors to manipulate the Senators fanbase into thinking this return is better than it actually is.

There is no way CBJ signs Duchene but loses Panarin and Bobrovsky, and risks regressing back to being one of the bottom teams in the East, and all this without a first round pick for the second year in a row. Duchene has already proven he can't be 'The Man' and be your lead offensive force. Two teams in a row where things wen't very sour for him. Maybe not totally all his fault but still it is not a good look.

I respect Jarmo for not letting himself be held hostage by his two pending UFA's and at least taking some sort of action. Standing pat would have been the worst thing to do. And there is no way you can go to your owner and tell him he has to lose out on what might be your best chance at making the playoffs for the next 2-3 seasons and everything that comes with it (extra revenue most importantly), and trade off two of your best players for futures instead.

You can't sell anyone on that. It would also probably demoralize the fanbase (which I feel is just on the cusp of being the next Nashville). Or maybe they say they understand and would rather take a step back instead. But it is one thing to say it and another thing to be home with no playoffs in April. That sucks big time.
 
Last edited:

JamieG19

Registered User
Dec 8, 2017
583
455
Columbus are suckers. Duchene is a loser and a cancer. Always has been, always will be. Can’t believe teams are still willing to invest in this guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SensFactor

CoachWithNoTeam

Registered User
Jul 1, 2006
1,536
819
San Diego
I think it’s strange that everyone is hung up on Panarin and Bob walking. Assuming they leave, Columbus will have 20-25M in cap space. Sure it’s a risk to acquire another UFA, but it’s also a risk to sell off all your assets for futures when you’re in a playoff spot. It’s a risk to sign a goalie to an 8 x 8 deal. They will have space and they will try to fill the void that Panarin and bob leave.

But considering what the void that Duchene is filling in the current lineup, and the potential to re-sign him, it is a risk that makes sense to take. They have struggled to find consistent offense from any line aside from their first line for the last two seasons, in large part because of the play of the centers. Wennberg has struggled to create offense at even strength for a while now, and he has been expected to be the second line center (really the first line center prior to Dubois’ emergence). Duchene pushes everyone down a slot into a more comfortable position. Dubois can have mismatches playing on the 2nd line. Jenner and Wennberg can be used in the bottom 6 in more defensive situations. Dubinsky, Nash, and Sedlak become just depth, fighting over a final roster spot, rather than relied on to produce.

This team is only a few wins out of first in the division, and a couple losses from missing the playoffs. Filling their biggest need without giving up anything from the roster can potentially make this team very good right now. It’s a risk to load up, but it might also be the right time to do it.
 

PoutineSp00nZ

Electricity is really just organized lightning.
Jul 21, 2009
20,104
5,714
Ottawa
This should, once again, be a reminder to all. You do not acquire bluechippers w rentals, unless there’s an anomaly GM.

Modest return for Ottawa. They’ll get a 15-20 first rounder. Unless they strike gold again, aka EK in the mid first, this pick won’t materialize into anything close to Duchene. Secondly, they didn’t return an A level prospect.

More proof that rentals don’t cost as much as fans think. Who knows, good chance he re-signs. IMHO, if you are in the playoff mix, more often than not, it’s better to augment. Most of the picks or prospects don’t materialize into much compared to the player you just acquired.

They got exactly what most people on the Sens boards thought they'd get. A first and two decent prospects, or one very good prospect and a conditional pick on re-sign.

Stone we're expecting a bit more for. Guess we'll see
 

Mr Positive

Cap Crunch Incoming
Nov 20, 2013
36,563
17,118
The conditional 1st rounder is a joke. Why would Duchene re-sign to play under a psycho coach like Tortorella in boring Columbus, OH rather than hitting open market? Senators should have asked for 2 more mediocre prospects instead.
if they win a bunch of playoff games I would bet players would be more likely to stay.
 

Dr Jan Itor

Registered User
Dec 10, 2009
45,501
20,383
MinneSNOWta
A very weird time to go for it with Tampa being what they are.

I probably would have kept the assets, gotten more for Panarin + Bobrovsky, and continued building around Jones, Werenski and Dubois, who are all still very young.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad