nameless1
Registered User
- Apr 29, 2009
- 18,202
- 1,019
Modern day slavery plantation? Yeah, ok. I mean, on one hand you have slaves that were beaten, raped, bought and sold and treated worse than cattle, on the other hand you have athletes many of which are going to school tuition free with room and board paid on their behalf - and those that are are not on scholarships being kids that are more than likely coming from significant means.
This might be the most asinine and completely ridiculous statements I have ever read.
Does the NCAA rules and regulations unfairly prevent the student athletes from making a living? Sure. Is it comparable to slavery? No, not in the least.
That is exactly the line that the NCAA likes to defend itself with.
If you read my links...
You will find that not every scholarship kid lives on campus.
Somehow...
Almost all of them...
Rather they live on campus or not...
Live at or below the poverty line.
Do you wonder why that is the case?
If an organization purposefully suppress someone's earning power to zero...
While it keeps all the profits...
How is that not slave labour?
You mention the lack of beatings...
But there are actually quite a bit of videos...
That show college coaches abuse their players.
Most of the time it is verbal...
But sometimes...
It does turn physical.
In a lot of these cases...
The coaches would probably get away with it too...
Because they have all the power...
And they probably would have kept their job too...
If the videos did not leak out.
Also...
Abuse does not always have to be physical.
A lot of these former players do not dare to speak up...
Because they are afraid to lose their scholarship...
As this is the only way for them to attend college...
And their only chance to get national exposure...
In order to become a higher draft pick.
Fear is how NCAA keeps its athletes in line...
And it is a form of psychological and emotional abuse.
I know we disagree on a lot of things....
But the bottomline is...
Do you really think that it is okay for a person to be forced to go to bed hungry...
Just because of some medieval rules to protect "amateurism"?
How is that not a form of slave punishment?
Last edited: