joestevens29
Registered User
- Apr 30, 2009
- 53,068
- 15,925
Does anyone ever take you seriousDesperate times call for desperate measures for Ken Holland. Is this the first year ever that he will sacrifice his 1st round pick?
Does anyone ever take you seriousDesperate times call for desperate measures for Ken Holland. Is this the first year ever that he will sacrifice his 1st round pick?
Desperate times call for desperate measures for Ken Holland. Is this the first year ever that he will sacrifice his 1st round pick?
How so?
He/She said desperate. Thought they were talking about Tre, the wizard down SouthAre you new?
For starters, where’s the “refusal to spend a couple million” coming in?
Edmonton want the Sharks to retain nearly 45%?!
$6,5m against the cap for the next 4 seasons. If Karlsson was a $6.5m cap defenseman, every team in the league would want him. He's not Neal Pionk nor Adam Pelech.
According to the analytics guys over at a prominent subscription site, he's playing at an expected value of $9.5m per. Retaining 20% is all the Sharks should accept and at that point, the cost should be whatever the prevailing rate for a Norris Trophy-level future HOF Dman is right now. Cups aren't won with paper - this guy is a phenomenal hockey player.
I'm not averse to trading Karlsson as this team won't be competing and the guy deserves a shot at a Cup. But we can't afford to gift another team for the privilege...
I don't understand why anyone would want either of those poor man's Phil Housleys for the playoffs, unless they desperately need a powerplay QB due to injury or something.Both klingberg and Ghost are the exact opposite of what the Oilers need.
2 problemsKarlsson has said he would waive his NMC for Edmonton, but right now SJ is only willing to retain 20%
need a 3rd team
- Sharks willing to retain $2m-$3m on the deal. Oilers want $5m retained.
- Oilers looked at Gavrikov but was too expensive and dont want to give up their 1st for a rental.
- Oilers looking at Gostisbehere and Klingberg as Alternatives.
Any deal involving Klingberg would absolutely be 50% retained by Anaheim.
Keep that in mind.
I don't really think thats the case. Retaining 2.3M of 11.5M leaves 9.2M left and with Karlsson last few years of play there too much risk. There a reason no other team is involved. I think somewhere in between is the sweet spot. 3.5M bring his contract down to 8M still has lots of risks. San Jose gets a few 1st and prospects to start their rebuild. Karlsson isn't helping the Sharks and if you are the owner do you prefer to pay out 46M over the next 4 years or 14 million.Ahahah the Oilers want $5m retained? No way in hell they get a Norris d-man for $6m cap hit long term without giving up every little piece of value in the their prospect pool. And even then, not much enticing there.
I wonder if the Oilers were ever serious about this. It was always going to be Ghost or Klingberg but Holland wanted it to look like he tried for an actual top pairing D
Ahahah the Oilers want $5m retained? No way in hell they get a Norris d-man for $6m cap hit long term without giving up every little piece of value in the their prospect pool. And even then, not much enticing there.
No random team is going to retain 3 million for 5 years for a player not on their teamKarlsson has said he would waive his NMC for Edmonton, but right now SJ is only willing to retain 20%
need a 3rd team
From the Sharks side, this never really seemed like it could work. Too many cap gynamstics. And while Holland doesnt have the best record for making smart trades, this was always a bad idea especially given there are a few PMDs available for less.
Maybe something can work in the offseason
Schenn is not a bigger fish he is a bottom 4 depth dman that get moved every deadline for a 2nd or a 3rd he is not blocking crap.Probably won’t see Karlsson moved until some of the bigger fish like Schenn are off the table.
Dominoes.
Ahahah the Oilers want $5m retained? No way in hell they get a Norris d-man for $6m cap hit long term without giving up every little piece of value in the their prospect pool. And even then, not much enticing there.
Well if Edmundson is worth a 1st!... Karlsson is untouchable.
As for here, I think Klingberg is a better target for Edmonton. It seems clear that Holland wants an upgrade on Barrie and Bouchard, someone with a bit more "dynamic" to their game.
to SJ:Translation - price is too high. Edmonton is hoping rumours about interest in other players scares the Sharks into lowering the price.
The only issue with this? I'm not sure if Holland wants to get rid of Campbell's contract. I'd consider it, although I wouldn't be too happy with a duo of Skinner and Kahkonen. Not that I'm satisfied with Skinner and Campbell either, ha ha.to SJ:
Soup
puljujarvi or Yamamamoto-SJ choice
Barrie
2023-1st
Bourgault or Schaefer-SJ choice
2024 or 2025 - 1st conditional on Oilers getting to the stanley cup final in either 23 or 24 or it becomes a 2nd.-SJ choice
to Oilers:
Karlsson 20% retained
Kahkonen
SJ gets a medocre starter but keep the retention palatable. they get a young forward prospect and potentially 2 1st's. Puljujarvi or Yamamoto are the wild card in this as they might actually be players as well, but you can let them walk to save cash. Barrie is a quality offensive d-man they could get assets for at the line.
Its expensive but this is a big piece and getting rid of the Cambell contract makes the conditional pick paletable.
He's not. In the past he has been a better puck carrier though. Edmonton is getting caught in the defensive zone an awful lot, and its mostly because our defensemen are having trouble clearing the zone. I'm not sold on Klingberg helping that, but he might be able to move the puck out a bit more effectively than some of our guys are right now.I'm not seeing how Klingberg is an upgrade on Barrie.