majormajor
Registered User
- Jun 23, 2018
- 24,744
- 29,450
The debate about the Oilers potentially picking up JHS is interesting - I think Ho-Sang is the best player on the ice of anyone being debated, but it's always been clear that his attitude issue is going to outweigh any skill advantage he might have. Ho-Sang would be the biggest upgrade on Nygard and be an ideal complement for Draisaitl and Kassian, but I can understand the Oilers not wanting to bring him into the room. They need to build a team concept, it's fragile enough as is.
This kind of comparison is super rough. These guys have rarely played regular minutes in the NHL so it's not a good way to evaluate them. I'd use rate stats actually, to control for the super high variability in their minutes and situations. Ho-Sang had a very impressive 2017-18, with a scoring rate that would have been 3rd on last year's Oilers, but wasn't able to repeat that in a very short call-up last year. Sprong never got much of a chance in Pittsburgh, with very limited minutes. Last year he showed he can score but nothing special overall.
Better than that limited minutes approach, we should rely on views, and from what I've seen, Ho-Sang is the more special player and more capable of elevating his linemates. Sprong's open-ice speed and shot are better but those qualities are not in short supply, even in Edmonton, and the rest of Sprong's game is subpar. If you're going to take one as a 4th liner, Sprong is capable of finishing on his own and that might be more valuable there, but if it's as a Nygard replacement then there's no question in my mind that Ho-Sang is the better player for the job. He has the puck skills to keep plays alive and create higher quality scoring chances.
Are you one of those people that thought Burrows was better than Henrik Sedin? Apologies if not, I'm just trying to find the reasoning in your argument.
I'd like to see Ho-Sang - Draisaitl - Kassian.
I'm not really sure what Nygard is supposed to be offering on the Nygard - Draisaitl - Kassian unit. It would be ideal to have a better playmaker next to Draisaitl and Kassian.
JHS - 23 y.o. 6' RW
- 37 point pace over 82 games (over his career).
- That's 1 point behind 5th on Edmonton last year.
- Over his first 2 years, he was on a 42 point pace, which would put him 4th last year on the Oilers.
Sprong - 22 y.o, 6' RW
- 25 pt per 82 (career so far), which would have been 8th on the Oilers last year.
- If you think he is the guy form last season, he is a 24 goal and 33 point guy who can really skate.
Both are much more gifted offensively than Kassian, and being able to move Kassian to the 3rd line would help improve the bottom 6.
Personally with the scoring touch of Drai, id like JHS if you are willing to give him a chance to win the spot. If you want someone on RNH wing than Spring is probably the better fit.
Either way, there is no reason a team like Edmonton with its lack of wingers wouldnt be improving by adding either of these guys.
I think most teams would be smart to take a shot at these guys if they are below 50 contracts and it fits in the cap.
This kind of comparison is super rough. These guys have rarely played regular minutes in the NHL so it's not a good way to evaluate them. I'd use rate stats actually, to control for the super high variability in their minutes and situations. Ho-Sang had a very impressive 2017-18, with a scoring rate that would have been 3rd on last year's Oilers, but wasn't able to repeat that in a very short call-up last year. Sprong never got much of a chance in Pittsburgh, with very limited minutes. Last year he showed he can score but nothing special overall.
Better than that limited minutes approach, we should rely on views, and from what I've seen, Ho-Sang is the more special player and more capable of elevating his linemates. Sprong's open-ice speed and shot are better but those qualities are not in short supply, even in Edmonton, and the rest of Sprong's game is subpar. If you're going to take one as a 4th liner, Sprong is capable of finishing on his own and that might be more valuable there, but if it's as a Nygard replacement then there's no question in my mind that Ho-Sang is the better player for the job. He has the puck skills to keep plays alive and create higher quality scoring chances.
what would a 26 goal scorer in over 150 games in the ahl contribute to a nhl team besides not much of anything.
Are you one of those people that thought Burrows was better than Henrik Sedin? Apologies if not, I'm just trying to find the reasoning in your argument.
Kassian showed very well on the top line last year while he was there. Neither Sprong or Ho Sang have shown more offensive talents at the NHL level. Kassian's issue is with consistency, not his hands or his skating.
Will he stick with the top line? I don't know. Well he stay motivated for 82 games? I don't know that either. Would Sprong or Ho Sang be better than him in the top 6? Doubtful.
I'd like to see Ho-Sang - Draisaitl - Kassian.
I'm not really sure what Nygard is supposed to be offering on the Nygard - Draisaitl - Kassian unit. It would be ideal to have a better playmaker next to Draisaitl and Kassian.