- May 30, 2013
- 42,963
- 18,384
Brooks is a dope, offensive-minded pure center? That couldn't be further from the truth.
Did you expect Larry to have a non-stupid opinion on hockey backed with facts?
Brooks is a dope, offensive-minded pure center? That couldn't be further from the truth.
Did you expect Larry to have a non-stupid opinion on hockey backed with facts?
On topic:
http://nypost.com/2015/07/14/oscar-lindberg-gets-1-3m-and-one-last-chance-to-make-rangers/
I guess Brooksie thinks Tanner's playing every game? Because 4th line LW seems like the most logical spot for him and he skips over it. Not like the Rangers haven't played a center on Dom's wing before.
lol it's not "easy to understand" the presence Glass brings since he's barely even a ****ing tough guy.
Lindberg was offensive in CT but yea he's more of a two way faceiff guy for the bottom 6
Perfect Moore replacement . Lol brooks
JFC, 6 pages in a OL signing thread and all people talk about is Tanner ****ing Glass where are the mods; who gives a **** about Glass, start his own thread, don't clog up this thread.
Glass was a solid player in the playoffs, but he doesn't score. Teams win Cups with high end talent and depth -- four lines that can score.
Glass doesn't help the scoring part, Lindberg will. That's being generous to Glass and to simple facts.
Bro at least Tanner Glass gets played to suck. Nash doesn't even score enough buckets.Again, people measure him against an absurdly low standard. Move that benchmark up to a competent 4th liner and he still sucked.
Did you expect Larry to have a non-stupid opinion on hockey backed with facts?