CoolburnIsGone
Guest
Sure but they just missed the playoffs last yr due to tie breaker of regulation wins and then made it this yr, pretty convincingly too. They're a team thats improving so to suggest it was just a fluke isnt even a question to me. You also have to factor in that they did make the playoffs without Horton basically, a top 6 forward capable of giving them around 50 pts.Yes, they have some pieces to the puzzle, but there's that thing consistency. We'll see if all the players you mentioned will bring it every year or this past year was simply a fluke. A few seasons ago, they thought Steve Mason was their number one and he stunk after their playoff berth, so they shipped him.
Mason only had his rookie yr where he played that well and they rushed him to the NHL. Bob has been excellent for the last 2 yrs...among the NHL's elite, winning the Vezina last yr and still among the league leaders this yr. With the change in management too, I wouldnt be too concerned with the short (or long) term direction of the Jackets.
I agree completely that they should be the model. I dont think we have a better young core really, even if we add Ekblad. Murray is probably just as good if not better than Ekblad is and he's already in the NHL playing 20 mins/game. Johansen put up >60 pts this yr so he's still ahead of Barkov & Bjugstad too. The biggest difference is they have a young franchise goaltender which we do not have. We could eventually have a better core but I'm not sure we catch them if most of their guys pan out the way it seems they will.Columbus should be a model team for us. Most of the key players on that team are young guys who are only going to get better. We actually might have a better young core than them, especially if we add Ekblad to the mix. The difference is their vets >>> our vets. They also have their goalie of the present and the future in Bobrovsky. The key for us is to improve the role players around our young talent and find a young goalie to develop behind Luongo.
Last edited by a moderator: