Sens didn't seem to like him, but Chiasson worked great for us in the bottom 6. He flounder greatly for obvious reasons when played in our 1st line.
Chiasson isn't as bad as some say. He's alright in the bottom 6. That being said, I'd rather pursue other options. However, I will say I am happy with the value of the Chiasson v Sieloff trade. I think many teams may be able to benefit by signing Chiasson to a low dollar contract.
Because we acquired Lazar and noticed a similar situation, Chiasson is expendable. I'm ok with him gone. I would rather try signing someone in FA this season than chase Chiasson.
Did you ever watch the Flames play?
Chiasson and Brouwer were the #1 and #2 reasons why Bennett had such a poor statistical season.
Chiasson is a 5th line player on most playoff teams. The problem is he doesn't know what it means to be a 4th line player. He still has it stuck in his head he's a Top 6 or Top 9 player that is expected to contribute offensively.
Really good bottom 6 players accept their role as being defensively sound as a checker where you are providing some energy to the Top 6 group and every now and then you contribute offensively.
Picture Matt Stajan. The best 4th line player in the NHL. He accepts his role. He excels in his role. He knows what is expected of him and doesn't try to play outside of his role.
Chiason is still chasing the idea of being an offensive player as it's the only way he can extend his career in the NHL. He is great at missing open nets and has hands of stone when it comes to making passes.
Just see Sam Bennett's league wide horrific shooting % for reference.