free0717
Registered User
Kreider for NO 10OA How about that offer???Not a terrible offer, but we need wingers and offensive D-man right now. Maybe a pick and somebody ready to play would be better.
Kreider for NO 10OA How about that offer???Not a terrible offer, but we need wingers and offensive D-man right now. Maybe a pick and somebody ready to play would be better.
Kreider for NO 10OA How about that offer???
Bern, the only trades you propose or consider are ‘if X steps up and overpays’. If Edmonton is going to overpay for anything it’s for a proven #1 defenceman, not kids that could have just been riding a heater.
lolWow.. that offer hasn’t been mentioned a million times already and shot down by Rangers fans. Congrats on being original.
You want Pionk.
Oilers don't want Pionk. He's not what we need. Only Ranger fans are pushing him onto us. Same with Hab fans and MaxPac.
Shattenkirk (with 15% retention) for Russell might be better.
#25+#30 comes nowhere close to getting the #10 pick, Peter Chiarelli wants a player that can help him not picks.
Might be better? Why don't the Rangers retain 50 percent on Shattenkirk will that get it done for Russell?Oilers don't want Pionk. He's not what we need. Only Ranger fans are pushing him onto us. Same with Hab fans and MaxPac.
Shattenkirk (with 15% retention) for Russell might be better.
Might be better? Why don't the Rangers retain 50 percent on Shattenkirk will that get it done for Russell?
Oilers don't want Pionk. He's not what we need. Only Ranger fans are pushing him onto us. Same with Hab fans and MaxPac.
Shattenkirk (with 15% retention) for Russell might be better.
Add NamestnikovAnd those two picks get into the #15 range not #10
No reason for the Rangers to do that.Shattenkirk (with 15% retention) for Russell might be better.
If we were poised to take Kotkaniemi, I'd ask for a bit more, but I'd probably do it. Those other pieces could be parlayed at the draft to address current roster needs. I agree we need to come out of this draft with one or two real solid prospects but this pick is something of value that should be capitalized on.#25+#30 comes nowhere close to getting the #10 pick, Peter Chiarelli wants a player that can help him not picks.
I would for Boston's 2nd. I wouldn't add our 2nd, not because I don't think it's the value in moving up, but there's still 3 good picks there if we don't.Would the Rangers do #12 from the Isles for #25, #30 and one of the 2nds?
You can't get #12 for the two late 1st's by themselves.
I would for Boston's 2nd. I wouldn't add our 2nd, not because I don't think it's the value in moving up, but there's still 3 good picks there if we don't.
Add Namestnikov
Yeah, when you type it out it seems like a lot of assets we're spending - essentially 3 pieces with a shot at making the team, but I think coming away with 2 players in the top 15 would be good for the Rangers.That's 25, 30 and 48 for 12 then?
Wow, a Ranger-Islander agreed upon trade! You're right about this. The Rangers are more likely in need of the two top pieces and we are more likely in need of more depth in this draft.
I would love to see Kotkaniemi, Hayton or maybe even Wahlstrom if he falls at #11, a group of Miller, Alexeyev, Woo and Samuelsson (2 of them) with the late 1st's. Then go after players like Dellandrea, Gustafsson, Wise, Ginning, etc. with the first 2 seconds and hope Ylonen is still there at 48. I'd be quite happy with that draft!
Oilers don't want Pionk. He's not what we need. Only Ranger fans are pushing him onto us. Same with Hab fans and MaxPac.
Shattenkirk (with 15% retention) for Russell might be better.
I think it's a pipe dream that Wahlstrom falls to 11. I think it's a bit of a dream that he falls to #9 so we can grab him. I'd prefer him over any of the guys I mentioned earlier. I think Kotkaniemi has potential to end up being a really good player available at the Islanders pick, especially if teams view him more as winger than a center based on his current season. There could end up being a center or 2 picked before him. That would be a steal of a pick at 11. With more time to showcase his ability he could have risen much higher.