DougGilmour93
Registered User
- Feb 7, 2007
- 7,395
- 702
I’ve heard he’s in the 7-7.5 range these days...If Nylander is really set on getting $8m I'd hope Minnesota isn't offering anything.
I’ve heard he’s in the 7-7.5 range these days...If Nylander is really set on getting $8m I'd hope Minnesota isn't offering anything.
Dumba onlyI read somewhere that Minnesota was one of the teams interested in Nylander. I also heard they might be offering up a package of Greenway and Brodin.
What do both fanbases think of a deal like that?
Either way I don't see any sense in speculating about all this. I have no idea exactly why he isn't signed yet, but the fact is that it's November and he still doesn't have a contract. I can't say what I'd be comfortable giving up when we still don't know what exactly Minnesota would be trading for.I’ve heard he’s in the 7-7.5 range these days...
Lol Minny has no one close to Marners value.This is not the Marner-Thread.
Thats still peanuts compared to the $6.25m cap hit they're taking.Why would Arizona buy him out? Surely Marleau playing with the Coyotes for $1.25m is much better for Arizona then paying $833k to buy him out plus paying $1m or more for the player to replace his roster slot on the team?
Thats still peanuts compared to the $6.25m cap hit they're taking.
Either way I don't see any sense in speculating about all this. I have no idea exactly why he isn't signed yet, but the fact is that it's November and he still doesn't have a contract. I can't say what I'd be comfortable giving up when we still don't know what exactly Minnesota would be trading for.
Nylander as a UFA probably makes $7.5-8 million. As an RFA however, without arbitration rights at that, anything above $7 million puts him well above his comparables. As to the position of that 1st rounder the Leafs would get in an offer-sheet, what genuine contenders right now have the cap-space to offer Nylander a $7.5-8 million contract? Would a team like Montreal or Vegas really be willing to gamble that they won't turn into this year's version of Ottawa and regress to being a lottery team? The risk of giving Toronto a shot at Jack Hughes seems like a big dettereant (and this is coming from a Leafs fan that vividly remembers when those 1st rounders for Kessel that were supposed to be in the 20s became Tyler Seguin and Dougie Hamilton).Free agents are getting overpaid regardless. William is probably worth $6 million now but on the open market he would get $7 million easily from a team with cap room. A lot has to do with age and skill. He may also be a Center. What I'm saying is the return the Leafs get by allowing an offer sheet won't be worth it. They would be better off trying to trade him. I doubt a team with a top five overall pick is making him an offer. More like a team outside the top 15 which lowers the first rd value. Since he hasn't asked to be traded yet the best course of action is for Dubas to continue negotiations. Nylander is losing money and doesn't have leverage but at the same time he's hurting the team. The longer this drags on the worse it is in terms of future dealings with the player.
I'm not sure whether Leaf fans are siding with player or owner.
Considering that paying Nylander that exhorbitant sum and not even buying his UFA years means they absolutely have to let Gardiner walk, can't afford to upgrade their blue line, and possibly even have real challenges affording Marner (if he really does turn into a point-per-game plus player this season), then no, it isn't worth it. Sometimes no contract is better than a bad contract, and also it all depends on what that 1st is. If it is from a team that could end up in the lottery (which is the vast majority of teams that have the free cap-space to be able to give Nylander such a rich contract), then suddenly the compensation looks more than fair.I don’t expect it to happen, but if somehow Nylander and another team did agree on a 5x $8.1m offer sheet then Toronto has to match. Nylander overpaid at $8.1m is still worth more then a 1st/2nd/3rd. Worst case the Leafs should be able to move him somewhere in the future (after the 1 year matching limit) for a better value then those picks.
Not really, as they can't do it without his consent.doubt leafs would trade marleau to free up cap space...feels like too much of a slap in the face for marleau
True, but only about 51% of all NHL fans qualify as delusional, so it could be worse.
Lots of buzz on talk radio here in vancouver this morning that the Leafs want Oli Juolevi badly and have coveted him for a while now.
( London Knights connection)
Some rumors being discussed is
Juolevi
Gudbranson
Virtanen
For
Nylander
3rd rnd pick
last I looked marleau on pace for 20 goals again ,doubt leafs would trade marleau to free up cap space...feels like too much of a slap in the face for marleau
Take out Virtanen and increase the TO pick to a couple of unprotected first and maybe.
What the Hell is this garbage?LOL absolutely what?
Virtanen is alright, I guess.
Gudbranson is a pylon.
Juolevi finally seems to have put it together, but he shoots left and between Rielly, Dermott and Sandin were crowded there. Who does he supplant there, because it sure as hell isn't Rielly and Dermott has an inside track.
Try take out Gudbranson and Juolevi and add Demko and a pick.
Willy + 3rd
For Virtanen, Demko and a 2nd.
...that's at least palatable, but another team would probably front a better offer.
What the Hell is this garbage?
You know how RFA works....right? I would let him sit before moving him for that trash.Here in the real world, sharks smell blood when you dump a big bucked of chum into the water.
Pesce + 1st+?
Toffoli + Martinez + 2nd?
It ain't a week before the first game of the season anymore.
Id almost rather give him a one year deal and either ship him at the deadline or have to deal with all this again next year than trade him for a lower package, but it is what it is.
Here in the real world, sharks smell blood when you dump a big bucked of chum into the water.
Pesce + 1st+?
Toffoli + Martinez + 2nd?
It ain't a week before the first game of the season anymore.
Id almost rather give him a one year deal and either ship him at the deadline or have to deal with all this again next year than trade him for a lower package, but it is what it is.
You know how RFA works....right? I would let him sit before moving him for that trash.
One of the TSN guys posted yesterday that they've heard he has come off of 8+, but not by much. I'd be surprised if he is as low as 7.5.I’ve heard he’s in the 7-7.5 range these days...
Could have had 48 million guaranteed (6 x 8 years) instead he may end up with 15 million (5x3 years). Good decision William.I dunno. Both sides have maintained that they want long-term deals. Seems odd to compromise in that way. The bridge-deal speculation is just that, speculation by the media and fans.
Not to mention that on a bridge deal Nylander is getting hosed for the next two years based on what he’s lost so far this year and not making very much on a bridge deal, which would be probably in the $4.5 to $5.25M range.
That’s garbage. Virtanen is a dime a dozen player, and goalie prospects don’t hold much value at all... and the Leafs have some good ones of their own.LOL absolutely what?
Virtanen is alright, I guess.
Gudbranson is a pylon.
Juolevi finally seems to have put it together, but he shoots left and between Rielly, Dermott and Sandin were crowded there. Who does he supplant there, because it sure as hell isn't Rielly and Dermott has an inside track.
Try take out Gudbranson and Juolevi and add Demko and a pick.
Willy + 3rd
For Virtanen, Demko and a 2nd.
...that's at least palatable, but another team would probably front a better offer.