Leaf Fans
Registered User
- Sep 29, 2017
- 20,163
- 8,629
Depends on the bad contract they would have to take with him I guess.Why would Detroit want him than?
Depends on the bad contract they would have to take with him I guess.Why would Detroit want him than?
Nylander is better than Larkin and would be #1C over him.
Well before Matthews marner and co came along he was >0.5 ppg as a Rookie. On pace for 48 points.
So sick argument but it doesn’t work. To try and perform your mental gymnastics that he’s a product of his peers and not at all driving his own play is downright childish and ignorant to that he’s a very good hockey player. You can have a lucky season, maybe 2, but he’s proven he’s a top line player for years. It’s embarrassing you’re trying to argue otherwise.
your entire argument boils down to a straw man ‘well he could be a 40 point forward’ that’s a joke. And you know it.
6.96 million is the going rate for a 60-70 point player Who’s 24 years old.
I'm sorry, but yes that's how it works.
The idea that player point scoring happens in a vacuum completely disconnected to overall team quality and team scoring is unfounded.
Leafs score more because they have better players, that helps everyone put up more points. You CAN'T isolate Bertuzzi from a historically bad team, just like you can't pretend that Nylander puts up his points completely regardless of whether his teammates are Matthews, Marner, Tavares or Erne, Abdelkader, Nielsen.
Nylander is also playing with elite players compared to Bertuzzi.leafs pass. Nylanders three best seasons all better than Bertuzzis career year....and he is a year younger.
Sorry guys Its kinda mean to rub it in that our 5th or 6th best player is better or even to your best player.LMFAOOOOO fiction can be fun
I agree with all of that definitely.Sure, but let's not forget that Connor Brown scored 43 points on the Senators this year. Bertuzzi is a perfectly good player, but he was playing 19 minutes a night on a bad team, and even bad teams score goals (see Ottawa and Connor Brown). It's not independent of teammates, but it's not as clear cut as good teammates = more points. There's lots of opportunities for good players to look great on terrible teams due to icetime and opportunities. Take Bertuzzi and put him on the Leafs sure he'll get to play with Tavares and Matthews but he'll be getting way less ice time, far fewer looks on the PP, and a variety of other factors that will either add or contribute to his scoring. It's really not a simple conversion.
If Bertuzzi was as good as Nylander, Larkin was a legit #1C, Cholowski and Mantha were blah blah blah repeat ad nauseum for all your guys, the Red Wings wouldn't have been a historically bad team this year. There are some good players on your team, but it's not logical to assume that your guys would plug into equal roles on the Leafs and see equal success.
Is Biega still playing D for the Wings?I agree with all of that definitely.
Although guys like Bertuzzi, Mantha, Larkin are definitely not to blame for the Red Wings overall performance. Wings had probably half the roster not at an NHL level at all.
Hardly doubt Nylander is better then Larkin, Nylanders best season is 61 points on a stacked Leafs team, While Larkin's best season is 73 points on a scoring challenged Red Wings team. If anything Larkin and Nylander are basically the same.Nylander is better than Larkin and would be #1C over him.
The question is though, can he perform well if he didn't have great teammates like his does in Toronto? I am not super convinced that he can. He could very well be a 40 pt player, whose production goes up with elite linemates. He isn't exactly skating out there with nobodies. Also, I am not saying this is a good trade, in fact I wouldn't do it either, but lets not pretend that Nylander is elite cause he is not, and he gets paid 7 mil which whether you like it or not, is a lot of money for not elite.
Curious how Engvall being sent to the minors helps the Leafs be cap compliant, When there's a good chance that there will be no minors this year. Good chance that the AHL gets cancelled.No they are cap compliant for the season by sending Engvall to the minors
Exactly, There's no comparison.Nylander is also playing with elite players compared to Bertuzzi.
He's basically our #7 Dman.Is Biega still playing D for the Wings?
Curious how Engvall being sent to the minors helps the Leafs be cap compliant, When there's a good chance that there will be no minors this year. Good chance that the AHL gets cancelled.
If by "typical" you mean "fringe opinion" you nailed it. Is it a "typical" of Wing fans to assume one person speaks for everyone? I'm guessing no and it's one fringe opinion talking to another pretending they matter.This is your typical leaf fan quote. You can change nylander to any player on leafs roster and that's about it.
He’s a guy who plays hard every shift, whether he has the puck or not. That’s what I like about Burtuzzi too. He’s a player with or without the puck. It’s sometimes a bad move trading guys who play that way for a guy who doesn’t.He's basically our #7 Dman.
If there's no AHL there will have to be a reserve list, Where teams will have so many players in reserve in case of injuries that wont count against the cap. Probably that's how it will work.Even if there is no AHL, I don't think the NHL will say that all AHL players for every team are going to count against that team's cap. I think they'll have a mechanism that allows players to be "sent down" and not be on the NHL roster / not count against the cap, but be available for emergency call-up. Maybe something like they did in the bubble.
Going to be unique for sure, but I think they'll have an appropriate mechanism.