Confirmed Trade: [NSH/NJD] P.K. Subban traded to Devils for Santini, Davies, 2019 2nd and 2020 2nd Part II

Uncle Scrooge

Hockey Bettor
Nov 14, 2011
13,546
8,133
Helsinki
Santini waived by Nashville

This trade just keeps looking better...

Well, the way Nashville looks at it, is Duchene + 2x 2nds.

Maybe its unfair to look at it like that from the outside, but all that matters to the organization is what goes out what comes in.

Also have to consider they were working under a timeframe, can't wait for the best deal when you're about to sign a big fish.
 

ijuka

Registered User
May 14, 2016
22,456
15,114
Well, the way Nashville looks at it, is Duchene + 2x 2nds.

Maybe its unfair to look at it like that from the outside, but all that matters to the organization is what goes out what comes in.

Also have to consider they were working under a timeframe, can't wait for the best deal when you're about to sign a big fish.
Sorry, but you can't include non-trade pieces in trades. This trade's in a vacuum. If 2 2nds was the return, they should have been able to do better.
 

Porter Stoutheart

We Got Wood
Jun 14, 2017
14,927
11,329
It feels to me like the Preds "knew all along", in some non-tamperingesque common knowledge way, that they'd have a very very good chance of landing Duchene. Like, near certainty. From long before July 1st or this trade. So they knew they were going to have to clear cap. And at the same time, I got the sense from Subban's exit interview comments that he knew it too and that he was pretty ok with moving on and probably told the Preds that. So the Preds weren't really looking at any other way of clearing cap either, and that pretty much fits with the whole May-June rumormill of Subban being on the block. Trading Subban was basically a built-in part of the Duchesne signing for us.

I happen to think the Preds could have been a much stronger team if they had found other ways of clearing the cap space - we have $3M unused right now and Turris is $6M of relative inutility, so that right there is a Subban. But by mutual accord, it sounds like nobody was even looking at any other avenue.

Santini was only ever a minor cap dump, so him being waived means nothing. I think Davies may turn out to be the biggest return in the deal, bigger than the 2nds. Although they turned last year's 2nd which was pretty high at #34 into a later 2nd and a 3rd and we like Afanaseyev a lot so far as the first returns on that pick.

From the Nashville perspective we are only EVER going to look at this deal hand in hand with the Duchene signing. It's all part of the same thing to us. Davies, two seconds - that became two 2nds and a 3rd so far AND Duchene. Even the biggest Subban fans amongst us are in favor of this deal. But hey, it can be win-win too, as the Devils are getting what they wanted and didn't have to give up prime assets for a #1D. It's great all around, I'd say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ben Matlock

hockeyguru

Registered User
Sep 10, 2019
748
337
predators could've had both subban and duchene if they didn't have turris, santini, and salomaki. what could've been.
 

Riptide

Registered User
Dec 29, 2011
38,887
6,520
Yukon
Sorry, but you can't include non-trade pieces in trades. This trade's in a vacuum. If 2 2nds was the return, they should have been able to do better.

When the whole reason for making the trade is the cap space to sign said "non trade piece" sure. I get why you don't want to, but the whole reason Nashville moved Subban was so that they could sign Duchene.
 

BurntToast

Registered User
May 27, 2007
3,387
2,675
Saratoga, New York
First, this thread bump scared the poop out of me. It’s early.

As a Devils fan; Nashville definitely tampered!? :sarcasm: JK JK. Davies was going to fight for a spot on the Devils this season. He was a solid prospect and I was sad to see him leave the organization. This was a win/win trade and other fans can cry a river.
 
  • Like
Reactions: preds1 and jonu

GeeoffBrown

Registered User
Jul 6, 2007
6,083
4,048
Santini won't get claimed. Nashville will probably draft a top 4 defenseman with one of those 2nds
 

Rob Brown

Way She Goes
Dec 17, 2009
16,986
13,714
When the whole reason for making the trade is the cap space to sign said "non trade piece" sure. I get why you don't want to, but the whole reason Nashville moved Subban was so that they could sign Duchene.
But in a vacuum it's still a pretty bad return. It doesn't really matter that they knew they were going to sign Duchene, they still traded Subban for a poor return.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HabsQC

DEANYOUNGBLOOD17

Registered User
May 10, 2011
3,399
1,348
Addition by subtraction ...... Nashville is a better team without him and all his ego driven /pimp suit wearing/ ice dancing/ mouth wash attention grabbing tactics.

The 2 2 nds are just a bonus that Polle will use to add 2 great prospects to the organization.
 

JustaFinnishGuy

Joonas Donskoi avi but not a SEA fan ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Mar 3, 2016
6,206
3,380
Finland
This didn't need a bump. It wasn't a win-win deal. You don't judge deals because of what was done outside of them.
NSH lost big on this one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HabsQC

FFWRX

Unregistered User
Feb 12, 2007
686
76
Greenbrier, TN
But in a vacuum it's still a pretty bad return. It doesn't really matter that they knew they were going to sign Duchene, they still traded Subban for a poor return.
It was probably the only offer that didn't have the Preds retaining some salary.
 

nbwingsfan

Registered User
Dec 13, 2009
21,346
15,272
But in a vacuum it's still a pretty bad return. It doesn't really matter that they knew they were going to sign Duchene, they still traded Subban for a poor return.

But they had to. If this was the best offer they had, should they have just held onto Subban and risked having Duchene sign elsewhere?

I don’t think so.
 

ViewsFromThe6ix

Zachary on the Attackary
Oct 17, 2013
10,887
4,901
6ix
But they had to. If this was the best offer they had, should they have just held onto Subban and risked having Duchene sign elsewhere?

I don’t think so.

How about keeping Subban and not signing plugs like Turris, Smith, Bonino, Sissons. That's what 15+m right there for Turris. Nashville has too much dead weight to simply point to "Duchene for Subban" as the sole tradeoff they can make.
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
85,296
138,883
Bojangles Parking Lot
Sorry, but you can't include non-trade pieces in trades. This trade's in a vacuum. If 2 2nds was the return, they should have been able to do better.

The purpose of the trade is to make your team better. Not to “win” a non-existent trade value contest.

If a team uses a trade to free up space for a UFA, you absolutely factor that in. Otherwise the whole evaluation is nonsensical.
 

Mr Positive

Cap Crunch Incoming
Nov 20, 2013
36,126
16,597
it goes to show that deals are mostly judged by the state of team. I agree that this deal on its own is bad, but the Predators were bad. They made the playoffs, but seemed in decline. Without cap space, there was little help of fixing the roster.

Also, there's the cap space angle. We really ought to start looking at cap space as a real asset. It's not that the Devils were such great negotatiators that they convinced the Preds that Santini and Davies were such great players. It was that they were willing to take on that much net cap in one deal.

I don't even think you can claim that the Preds knew that Duchene would sign. But, with all that cap space they would have definitely found a way to fix their team. Because, all of a sudden they were in the spot NJ was in, where they had all this cap to spend and leverage
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad