There is so much wrong with this post that I hardly know where to begin. First of all expansion has nothing to do with us losing Bishop or Vasy, as Bishop is a UFA and Vasy will be protected. We could theoretically keep both if we could afford to do so. Second I have always been adamant about not trading Vasy under any circumstance so you're arguing against something I never said in the first place. Third this debate has been about whether or not to keep Stamkos over Johnson, and now that you've realized you can't defend your position on the matter you think you can distract us from that fact by shifting to a completely different argument - you're not fooling anybody. And finally "my facts are I think" perfectly sums up the quality (or lack thereof) of your argument: you can't support your position with either facts or logic and you erroneously believe that your opinion is self-validating.
In closing I'll add that given the sheer number of flat out factually incorrect things I've seen you post with regard to expansion, the cap, etc. you might want to refrain in the future from making smartass comments like "you do know you have to play 82 games to get to the playoffs?" It's one thing to come with an attitude when you actually know what you're talking about; to do so when you clearly don't simply makes you look foolish.