i agree, i think terry came on late and the team needs scoring
when hes not, hes not doing much else, but terry can occasionally score
when hes not, hes not doing much else, but terry can occasionally score
If he maintains or gets better, it's great. If he regresses, it's hardly an albatross but becomes an annoyance I suppose. I thought he really had a good year.
If that line gets seperated, I don't know what I would expect offensively out of Nordstrom. He's got size, speed and can forecheck. Good role player. Worth keeping. I hope we have seen the last of the terry/nash/gerbe/malone group. I'd like to see no more than one of those come back.
Wow. The Canes' twitter account actually did something funny. Cool.
A new and improved Patrick Dwyer. The upside is that you can just leave that Jordan line together, and focus on getting a top line.
An interesting balance between sticking with what you know, and rolling the dice on finding something else.
That's part of the reason this worries me. It's not the extra $500k per year. It's the fact that in so doing, they've likely given us an indication of where they slot him. Which seems to be comfortably on the third line if not above. He played about 15-19 minutes a night last year towards the end which seems to be a trend more towards 2nd line. Looks a lot like the Gerbe signing a few years back.
Wait... the Canes are eleventy billions dollars below the floor, and we're worried that $500k is a signal?
It's a decent flexible deal. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
It's fine. At least Nordstrom has some size and good enough speed. Gerbe disappeared because he's as physical as a wet noodle.
I don't know if that's fair to Gerbe. I think that it's just much easier to notice a lost step at 5'6" than it is at 6'0". When your entire game is predicated on your shiftiness and not much else, it's a death sentence to get banged up a lot.
That's part of the reason this worries me. It's not the extra $500k per year. It's the fact that in so doing, they've likely given us an indication of where they slot him. Which seems to be comfortably on the third line if not above. He played about 15-19 minutes a night last year towards the end which seems to be a trend more towards 2nd line. Looks a lot like the Gerbe signing a few years back.
Fully agree about Nash. I don't see a future for Terry here and if there is, it means RF disappointingly has basically kept the status quo.I hope we keep Nash...I fear we keep Terry. Nash is very versatile and easily outplayed Terry the 2nd half of the year. Add to that he can play both wing and center as well as looked really good on the PP and PK, I keep him as a 4th liner that can move up to the third line in an emergency.
Is "upside" a concern with a 24-year old who has 135 games played over 3 years in the league? I thought that was the laughable part of the kid's comment.
Fully agree about Nash. I don't see a future for Terry here and if there is, it means RF disappointingly has basically kept the status quo.
The Nordy deal is fine. But if he's playing with Staal again on the de facto 2nd line, this team has big depth problems yet again. He's a 3rd liner/4th liner with more value on the 4th IMO.
^That's crazy talk about Nordy and Nesty each being 40 point players and Jordan isn't hitting 60 with those two. This reminds me of last year's silliness here about Terry hitting 40 points. N&N are nice role players period, not guys who will solve the depth problem. They are both bottom 6 guys and if they both play in the top 6 all season, it's another year of missed playoffs. This roster is lacking two scoring forwards and they are not those guys.