This is exactly what I hate here, people mostly talk about the negative. I did say he wasn't a good GM overall. You still gotta give credit where credit is due. He did draft those guys, no one else did. He did turn Galchenyuk into Anderson. He did sign Toffoli and he did brought us to the cup. No one else did that for a while and that's something. Never said he was the greatest, but I did appreciate a lot the finals run and it was under Bergevin.
Also, stop acting like he could've signed superstars, there's litteraly no one who wants to come here. We have to develop our own stars. Yes he and Timmins did pick like shit for most of his tenure, but I'm pretty sure Molson didn't want him to rebuild like HuGo is doing right now.
Yeah there is a double standard with the Bergevin critique when he gets full blame for everything that was a miss but no credit for his hits.
Ultinately, Bergevin did fail though. The reason I say this is because the Habs should have gone for it all in the mid 2010s when Markov was still very good, and you had subban in his prime along with newly acquired petry. That's an amazing top 3.
Really, if he had done whatever it took to land a 1C, whether that meant dealing multiple first rounders, you do it. It was time.
Now, it turns out that Price's injury woes took a turn for the worse after 2015, but none of us knew that would be the case. You can't predict injuries, but you can idebtify the time when you are ready to go for it, and he just didn't do enough.
I give him credit for winning a good amount of trades. The petry trade was especially a Houdini act. But it was like we were making incremental improvements on the trades in general but not really moving the needle in the big picture.