DanZ
Registered User
- Mar 6, 2008
- 14,495
- 31
This fake-macho opinion always annoyed the **** out of me.
When one of your top guys is out, you hope you can win without him. Sometimes, the team pulls together and wins anyway, despite the injury. And that's great. That's the goal.
But OF COURSE injuries are an excuse. If one guy didn't matter, we wouldn't be paying some guys 10x more than others.
We are going to try to compensate and win without him, but saying his injury isn't an excuse is nothing but useless bravado.
Yeah you win with talent in the long-run. If one of your most talented players is out, especially someone that's already from an area of weakness (defense), that's going to hurt your chances of winning. Our talent level has decreased, so our chances of winning games have decreased. Hopefully other players can step it up, but if they can't, than it's certainly fair to blame some of the defensive shortcomings on missing Kronwall. That's what we pay him for.