On a decent hockey team like the Jets, Myers was basically a fifth d-man. Every time they tried to move him into a top four role with top-four minutes because of injuries, he basically flopped. It's the major reason the Jets just let him walk.
Up steps Jimbo with a $6m contract over five years. Everybody in hockey said it was an 'overpayment'. But Benning knows best, then again maybe not. Because it's not much different that coughing up valuable assets to acquire Gudbranson, and then anointing him as a top-four d-man (he wasn't close).
So if Myers is playing top-four minutes for the Canucks, it basically means they must be a bad hockey team.
It really depends on what your definition of a 5th D is. If you want to call him a 5th D because he is playing on the third pairing then I guess he could be called a 5th D based on your definition. It is kind of silly if you don't look at anything else
On a team 1st and 2nd best D don't always play on the 1st pairing, 3rd and 4th best D don't always play on the 2nd pairing. Most teams spread out of the three pairings.
Part of this season Schmidt was playing with Myers, Edler with Chatfield and Benn with Hughes on the third pairing. If these pairings were kept together. Are you going to called Hughes number 5D? Of course not, Sopel played on the 1st pairing with Ohlund. So you think Sopel is a number 1/2 D? of course not. Salo was on the third pairing a lot, Is salo a number 5 D? Of course not.
Myers with the Jets he was 2nd to 4th in ice time every season. Played on the 2nd unit pp and PK unit. These three were clearly better than Myers, Buff, Trouba and Morrisey. Chiarot at that time wasn't better than Myers. Myers played on average 5 more mins than him Chiaort and more on special teams as well. That means the coach didn't see Chiarot more valuable than Myers. Myers was clearly number 4 on the depth chart.
You're right Myers did struggle when he was moved in the top 4. He did play a lot better on the top 4 with Morrisey. Struggle with Chiarot, The thing with Myers he is a number 4, he is not good enough to carry a pairing with a lower end D in the top 4. He needs to be paying with a legit top 4 D in the top 4.
Anyway, at least we were making progress. In the blues series you did say Myers a number 6, now a number 5 D. Maybe next time you will call him a number 4 D.
Depending on how to deep the D is. Myers is anywhere from number 4 or 5 D. At least half he will be a number 4.