EveryDay
Registered User
- Jun 13, 2009
- 13,216
- 5,310
LOL Poehling 4th center, dude you cant be serious
Yeah more like;
Drouin-Kotkaniemi-Kakko
Domi-Poehling-Gallagher
Hudon-Suzuki-Lehkonen
Byron-Danault-Armia
LOL Poehling 4th center, dude you cant be serious
He is sharing the center role with Hancock...
OS system allows them to have 2 centers in the same line
Yeah more like;
Drouin-Kotkaniemi-Kakko
Domi-Poehling-Gallagher
Hudon-Suzuki-Lehkonen
Byron-Danault-Armia
Is 50-60 good enough?So realistically how much points you think he could make in the NHL if he becomes full time? I sort of see 50-60 point range, but that's if the team improves with elite level talents
So realistically how much points you think he could make in the NHL if he becomes full time? I sort of see 50-60 point range, but that's if the team improves with elite level talents
I mean if he gets team mates that are like Nylander and Marner with similar elite talent and him being on a line with them (not Marner or Nylander) like predicting of how many points...Is 50-60 good enough?
Which elite level talents are we talking about here - I thought Suzuki was meant to be our most skillful prospect?
How will he get those linemates?I mean if he gets team mates that are like Nylander and Marner with similar elite talent and him being on a line with them (not Marner or Nylander) like predicting of how many points...
How will he get those linemates?
If Suzuki and Kotkaniemi play together, neither are blue-chip prospects and Kotkaniemi looks more like a two-way guy than an offensive-minded powerhouse point producer. Personally, I just don't see it.
How much will he score if everything goes well - 60? 70?way too early to tell, but Kotkaniemi seems to have elite hands and hockey sense to go along with a solid two way game. But it's waaaaaaaaaaay too early to tell if that will translate into elite production or not.
LOL Poehling 4th center, dude you cant be serious
I always wonder whether those things could be THAT significant for a player's development.
Still can't wait to see him there. Hopefully he's dominant.
You misread both of my posts, basically you're not getting it and I won't answer anymore lol, you could read them again then reply.How will he get those linemates?
If Suzuki and Kotkaniemi play together, neither are blue-chip prospects and Kotkaniemi looks more like a two-way guy than an offensive-minded powerhouse point producer. Personally, I just don't see it.
If he's playing both C and RW, then he's not a full time C. I guess we'll see how it shakes out.
For starters, will he be a C at the WJC? That could be a first sign that they're really taking his role as a C, seriously.
So realistically how much points you think he could make in the NHL if he becomes full time? I sort of see 50-60 point range, but that's if the team improves with elite level talents
How many 50-60 pt players does this turd of a franchise ever put out consistently? Then ask yourself honestly if you think Suzuki will get that. The odds say he's got talent somewhere between Byron and Gallagher, leaving him around a 40pt player. Now if we suck enormously and win a lottery or two the next couple years, Hughes and Lafrenière change the output of all the young kids. This team needs Lafrenière to salvage years of major suckage. They have to do it his draft year, or you know the Penguins or Oilers will just have a way of sucking their way to the 1st overall pick... because they know when to tank.
You forgot Evans, Pezzetta, and Addison! Character and attitude baby!We got like 2 captains in junior + Juulsen (former) + Gallagher + Poehling. I think we're good for the next decade of leadership!
Nah just the skilled ones I care aboutYou forgot Evans, Pezzetta, and Addison! Character and attitude baby!
Nah just the skilled ones I care about
The mean wasnt... ok. Evans is skilled btw...