Dude you are getting into an uproar and losing your mind over a very brief succinct and factual post.
You have things backwards.
You jumped into a conversation that had nothing to do with you. You accused me of downplaying him when it was clear I was doing the opposite. Then when I showed you this (in big bold letters) you instead doubled down.
Don't jump into conversations if you don't understand what's being said. Moreover, if you're not able to handle any kind of criticism of this guy then stick to this forum only and start ignoring posters who have different opinions.
Suzuki is better because he's changed the way he is playing his game.
He stopped deferring to everyone and started shooting more.
In the meantime shooting percentage means nothing to me it will go up and it will go down.
Claiming puck luck is a joke when nothing but skill was on display.
I didn't claim puck luck. I just wrote you out the quote again. I put it in big letters for you to read. But it seems you can't process it.
I don't know why...
I'll paraphrase my posts out again. Read it slowly.
I think Nick Suzuki took a big step forward this year. I think he went from borderline number one to average number one. His play in the second half was great.
Now... brace yourself for this part.
Maybe you want to skip this paragraph... He also had some puck luck. From Jan 25th onward he's shooting at 31 percent. That's an insane number. Sorry if it hurt you to read that, but it's true.
Okay ready? You can start reading again.
The puck luck part doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things. On the year it's high but not crazy overall. In the 2nd half of this year he took a huge step forward and has played the best hockey of his career. His play in the second half has been spectacular. Even when his teammates don't show up he has and that includes almost all the games even when he hasn't gotten points. He leveled up and I think it will continue into next year.