dave babych returns
Registered User
- Dec 2, 2011
- 4,977
- 1
edler travels across the ice and deals a violent blow to the head, so it should have been a charge under the 3rd criteria
It's clearly wide open to interpretation and the ref sitting five feet away didn't seem to think it was charging.
Furthermore Edler's review is for illegal contact to the head so your (or anyone else's) interpretation of the charging rule is completely irrelevant.
Edler moved across the ice then delivered a hit, which the league appears to think might have consituted illegal contact to the head. They are wrong, but that's another matter.