At the end of the day, I can at least say 2016 happened. I've never been more proud of a team. Kill them with speed and turn the other way after the whistle. Sid's ****ing demon robot moment where Thornton (?) was punching him and trying to knock him off his game was one of the best moments i've ever seen. He was so locked in he acted like it didn't even exist. My lord was it awesome.
Didn't he then whack Thornton in the leg right after the opening face off the very next game and just skate off to play the game? Wound him up even more.
Watching hockey has been all downhill for me from there.
I just wish that they would just pick an identity and stick with it. The Pens are exhibiting more personalities than Sally Field in Sybil.
You and I have screamed for an identity for years, celebrated when they finally and bravely embraced one during the two cup years, and then for no reason abandoned it completely for this schizophrenic tug of war between management styles.
Can anyone even still say what Pens' hockey is now? I would love to hear someone try and answer that.
I think I can tell you what the Pens identity and game plan is meant to be - puck possession, puck pressure; trying to play the game in their zone, going heavy on the turnovers. It is similar to what Sully was doing to begin with, but with more emphasis on boardplay and possession and less on quick strike transition and breakways. You will probably say "Why haven't I seen this" and the answer is, of course, because the GM hasn't really done wonders putting together the roster on this. The defence are somewhat inadequate on puck possession; the forwards underperformed quite majorly on puck pressure. I think the latter might have been the bigger sin.
In any case, yes. Confusion. There has been an evolution that hasn't been supported by recruitment or player development. Which is why I get why people look at prospects and say "What is going on". Just...
Sure as **** I don't know.
I've never seen any of these kids play. And i'm not going to be some keyboard warrior who claims to have done so. I'm trusting these scouting reports and they all sound like the same one.
... I read the reports and I see better things than Cole. Just one of those things I guess. And a lot more different things too; the variance on reports of Poulin's skating is mad.
But in any case, I think with most of them I'm seeing guys who can play Sully's forechecking game. That is the biggest part of our identity and I think they've mostly got the foundations to have the speed to play that - and I think Allvin thinks that too. There's a video in which DK is asking Allvin about their speed and he sounds positively enthusiastic about what can be done with their top end speed.
I dunno. Maybe he's part of the org wide delusion in which they thought the team they built post 16-17 would still be able to execute Sully's forecheck. Maybe Craig Button is right on Poulin and we dun ****ed up. At this juncture we really don't know. Just I think there's a bunch of ways to look at this, and there's definitely an angle from which it looks encouraging and it looks like they're working towards an identity.
Not that what Allvin thinks really matters when his draft is probably 3 years away from having a major impact on team identity at best if everything goes super well, and more like 5 or never, and its up to Rutherford to implement the speed/skill thing anyway.
Probably not enough budget. Clearly they are heavily scouting the Q and Finnish player right now.
The team has 10 amateur scouts, not including Allvin or the European scouts. I'm pretty sure with a bit of searching you could work out which one has the mid-west; given the org has two prospects there and signed a guy from a Minnesota school this summer for the AHL, they've got someone there.
I don't think there's any major junior league in North America they're not covering.