NHL All-Decade First & Second Teams

[End of Line]

How is Price left out? Price - Lundqvist would be interchangeable

 

[Ishdul]

Really hard to overstate how bad a choice Fleury is. He's really had as many outright bad years as good years, even factoring in his run with Vegas his playoffs have been average, and has not actually played more than the other comparable (re: better) choices. What's the reasoning there? Winning 2 Cups as a backup?

How is hedman not on any team? He has as many norris trophies as doughty.

His breakout came in the middle of the decade so that part is understandable.

 

[Little Psycho]

How is hedman not on any team? He has as many norris trophies as doughty.

He broke out later. Doughty has been in the spot light for a long time.

 

[Regal]

How is hedman not on any team? He has as many norris trophies as doughty.

Hedman wasn't elite until a few years into the decade. He has a case, but if anyone is coming out for him it should be Chara, who hasn't been elite for over half the decade.

 

[Ryan Michaels]

Doughty deserves his spot. Just putting it out there because I can hear the Karlsson fanboys sharpening their knives.

 

[Il Stugotz]

My favorite part is that they must’ve picked Fleury based on regular season wins.

 

[Ginormousthumbs]

I wonder if any of these voters bothered to cast their Veznia votes for Fleury during the decade.

 

[EdJovanovski]

Lundqvist >>> Fleury

 

[Hivemind]

"Best goalie of the 2010s"

 

[Regal]

Terrible list.

Kane-Crosby-Ovechkin
Keith-Karlsson
Lundqvist

Stamkos-Malkin-Giroux
Doughty-Chara
Price

HM: Bergeron, Mcdavid, Kopitar, Marchand, Tavares

They were off to a good start and then idk what happened.

I mean, there's some questionable choices but if over 80% of your list is the same players, is it really that terrible?

 

[Ivo]

Pretty good with the exception of Fleury who is a terrible pick here - he was abysmal in the playoffs for half of the decade and has never even been a runner-up for Vezina, nevermind winning one.

 

[Regal]

Crosby, Ovechkin, Kane, Malkin, Keith, Doughty, Karlsson and Lundqvist are pretty much no brainers. I don't really see any argument against them. Fleury is a weird choice though, but I think the 2nd goalie could be anyone from Price to Bob to Rask to Luongo. Chara sounded ok as the 4th defenseman, but I think that's just not really looking at when he declined. He's absolutely on this team if it was a play from 05-15, but he declined relatively early in the decade. Hedman probably makes the most sense, with cases for Weber or Burns, and maybe even someone like Pietrangelo for consistency.

 

[Honour Over Glory]

Lundqvist not being on the first team is insane

Yeah just a bunch of cup winners and the guy tied with him for winningest active goalie (in less games).

 

[Honour Over Glory]

My favorite part is that they must’ve picked Fleury based on regular season wins.

Of which he is tied with Lundqvist. In less games. Facing more shots over his career. Being a guy that was vital to 3 stanley cups. Went to the finals with 2 different teams, one being an expansion in its inaugural season.

Yeah, so undeserving.

 

[Honour Over Glory]

"Best goalie of the 2010s"

 

[sharks9]

Lundqvist should be 1st team

Price should be 2nd team

MAF should be behind Holtby, Quick, and Bobrovsky

 

[Hivemind]

Of which he is tied with Lundqvist. In less games. Facing more shots over his career. Being a guy that was vital to 3 stanley cups. Went to the finals with 2 different teams, one being an expansion in its inaugural season.

Yeah, so undeserving.

Zero Vezina wins.
Absolutely garbage playoff performances from 2010-2014.
Lost his starting job in the playoffs three times (2013, 2016, 2017).
Only Cup wins this decade came as the back-up.

He's the Chris Osgood of the 2010's

 

[Honour Over Glory]

Zero Vezina wins.
Absolutely garbage playoff performances from 2010-2014.
Lost his starting job in the playoffs three times (2013, 2016, 2017).
Only Cup wins this decade came as the back-up.

He's the Chris Osgood of the 2010's

Frankly, it doesn't matter what your bias is, he's on that 1st team decade thing.

2009 did happen, 2008 he was great in as well and in his last playoff with the Pens he was solid and one of the reasons the Pens even made it as far as they did. The 2nd of the back-2-backs, Fleury was the reason the Pens got as far as they did while Murray was hurt, the year before he had 2 concussions during the season and it allowed Murray to step up.

Osgood never made the finals with any other team but the DRW.

You can go on and on about it all you want, he's still on that "All Decade 1st Team.."

 

[Hivemind]

Frankly, it doesn't matter what your bias is, he's on that 1st team decade thing.

2009 did happen, 2008 he was great in as well and in his last playoff with the Pens he was solid and one of the reasons the Pens even made it as far as they did. The 2nd of the back-2-backs, Fleury was the reason the Pens got as far as they did while Murray was hurt, the year before he had 2 concussions during the season and it allowed Murray to step up.

Osgood never made the finals with any other team but the DRW.

You can go on and on about it all you want, he's still on that "All Decade 1st Team.."

2008 and 2009 aren't part of this decade...

 

[Honour Over Glory]

2008 and 2009 aren't part of this decade...

If they are going by "decade" then 2009-2019 is what they are measuring by.

2020 is 24 days in, I guess that's the whole year!

 

[Hivemind]

If they are going by "decade" then 2009-2019 is what they are measuring by.

2020 is 24 days in, I guess that's the whole year!

You just keep digging yourself deeper, buddy. 2010-2019 is a decade. Learn how decades work.

 

[Honour Over Glory]

You just keep digging yourself deeper, buddy. 2010-2019 is a decade. Learn how decades work.

Look below, he's still there. Laugh all day bud. He still won 2 cups in those 10yrs.

 

[Glen Sathers Cigar]

Lundqvist should be 1st team

Price should be 2nd team

MAF should be behind Holtby, Quick, and Bobrovsky

Yep, this is how I would have it.

Fleury is good, probably 5th or 6th in the decade. But having him at number 1 is just lunacy.

 

[Regal]

Frankly, it doesn't matter what your bias is, he's on that 1st team decade thing.

2009 did happen, 2008 he was great in as well and in his last playoff with the Pens he was solid and one of the reasons the Pens even made it as far as they did. The 2nd of the back-2-backs, Fleury was the reason the Pens got as far as they did while Murray was hurt, the year before he had 2 concussions during the season and it allowed Murray to step up.

Osgood never made the finals with any other team but the DRW.

You can go on and on about it all you want, he's still on that "All Decade 1st Team.."

What if your bias is for goalies who were more than just above average?

 

[LeHab]

Whoever voted for Fleury there must have been the same who did not vote for Malkin among Top 100 GOAT.