EvenSteven
Registered User
- Sep 3, 2009
- 7,531
- 6,550
I see no reason to force 3 in 3’s on teams unnecessarily. Sure, schedule as many games as possible but if you can get through a schedule via 3 in 4’s or 3 in 5’s, as well as a few 3 in 3’s, then do that. Nothing wrong with Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday games. If teams want a schedule like the Ottawa example above to address travel, just make the schedule makers aware of their desires.
If there is a shortened season, I agree that only playing games within your conference makes a ton of sense. Helps reduce travel. More 4 point games equals more meaningful games.
If the season is shortened to 48 games (example). We go with 6 games within the division (24) and 4 vs the rest of the conference (20). Add four rivalry games and you get your 48.
If there is a shortened season, I agree that only playing games within your conference makes a ton of sense. Helps reduce travel. More 4 point games equals more meaningful games.
If the season is shortened to 48 games (example). We go with 6 games within the division (24) and 4 vs the rest of the conference (20). Add four rivalry games and you get your 48.