hubofhockey
Registered User
- Aug 14, 2003
- 4,938
- 0
bp13 said:Point well taken KPD. However, the one thing to note is that if talks get revived thanks to a groundswell of player frustration, it's a good indication that the "greed and stupidity that ruled the union at the very moment it needed reason" was being directed by one man, the head of the union. If the players, as THE UNION, get this deal done, we'll know that the stubborn lunacy displayed the NHLPA in recent weeks was largely the result of Goodenow's influence. Not that that doesn't still fall down on the players, but we are talking about hockey players here. This isn't a Mensa International group.
Beeps -- No argument here. But I think it's important to keep in mind that the players choose their exec council (counsel? console?), and they do that to have a voice, and a range of opinions--not just in times of peace, but especially in times of very hard decisions. Yes, Goodenow and Saskin lead the parade, but union members have to realize, it's imperative for them to make their voice known. Maybe now they realize, it's not just nod your head, and collect your check every two weeks. It's important to be engaged. Your welfare may one day depend on it.
kpd/hoh