Negan4Coach
Fantastic and Stochastic
They'll decide in September 2019. If NHL or NHLPA opts out of the CBA at that time, it terminates in summer 2020. Otherwise, 2022.
And last time there was an opt out versus an expiry of the CBA?
They'll decide in September 2019. If NHL or NHLPA opts out of the CBA at that time, it terminates in summer 2020. Otherwise, 2022.
They'll decide in September 2019. If NHL or NHLPA opts out of the CBA at that time, it terminates in summer 2020. Otherwise, 2022.
If we sign Fox next year would he become a UFA at the end of his ELC? I'm not well versed on the specifics of his situation.
I think it might be a 2 year ELC then RFA for 3?
So 5 years as an RFA (if he signs in the spring then this season gets knocked off) or stay 1 more year at Harvard, graduate, and become a UFA?
Not exactly. They get to pick where they go but they aren't UFAs until they hit 27 (?) or 7 years in the NHL.
For example: Jimmy Vesey went this route and signed with NYR in 2016. He just finished his first 2 year deal and had to go through RFA negotiations. It isn't as if he had the freedom again as a UFA after locking in with NYR. I'm not 100% on this but IIRC they also might have a salary constraint. I think I remember seeing at one point that Schultz (who also went the NCAA 4 year route) could only sign for ELC max of ~$3.7 million at the time.
With the $$ that top-end RFAs are getting coming off their ELCs these days, IMO Fox would be silly not to sign with the Canes at the tail end of this season, burn one ELC year, and start next year on 2/3 of his ELC. He could be looking at a $5+ million long-term deal by 2020.
https://www.tsn.ca/radio/toronto-10...o-nylander-s-agent-about-a-contract-1.1210171
Waddell also says that an offer sheet doesn't make sense as "The problem with our situation is that we could be, very easily, another lottery pick this year. We could have a top-3 pick again". Fun times.
you're almost certainly not going to hear anything about a rebuild plan as long as playoffs are even the slightest mathematical possibility. they're in the business of getting butts in seats, and will definitely put on a face of playoffs or bust until the need to change that arises.Thanks for posting this, I hadn't seen it. I'm still curious as to what expectations Dundell had for team performance this year.
When TD said something to the effect of "...if this doesn't work, I'll look pretty dumb"...was that in context of team performance this year or to a longer-term plan...the "this" being all the unorthodox moves.
If it's the latter, have they been upfront about their vision? I haven't heard any discussion of a rebuild plan.
Not exactly. They get to pick where they go but they aren't UFAs until they hit 27 (?) or 7 years in the NHL.
For example: Jimmy Vesey went this route and signed with NYR in 2016. He just finished his first 2 year deal and had to go through RFA negotiations. It isn't as if he had the freedom again as a UFA after locking in with NYR. I'm not 100% on this but IIRC they also might have a salary constraint. I think I remember seeing at one point that Schultz (who also went the NCAA 4 year route) could only sign for ELC max of ~$3.7 million at the time.
With the $$ that top-end RFAs are getting coming off their ELCs these days, IMO Fox would be silly not to sign with the Canes at the tail end of this season, burn one ELC year, and start next year on 2/3 of his ELC. He could be looking at a $5+ million long-term deal by 2020.
Sure wish we could get this guy signed already. Seems like we should just give him what his side's last ask was as it will be likely going up if the team twiddles their thumbs....
I think you answered the question yourself: Dundon hired Waddell to be the fall guy.Why does the ousting of Skinner keep falling at Waddell's feet? It seemed entirely a Dundon + RBA decision, Waddell is just the fall guy.
I was in the same boat. It's worth it.Welp, bought my Athletic subscription since you nancies won't stop with the damn articles.
Welp, bought my Athletic subscription since you nancies won't stop with the damn articles.
I was in the same boat. It's worth it.
Didn't see it posted by anyone else. Sara had a nice article up highlighting TT's play so far this season:
Why fix what isn't broken?