Ritche- But could Nash have been the difference against LA really? Was the problem that he didn't wake up on the right side? Wasn't willing to pay the price or whatever? From my POV the line of Kreider-Step-Nash didn't manage to play well as a unit to open things up on the ice, to force LA to scramble, and Nash didn't have anything going his way. Under those circumstances I just don't see Nash scoring goals on a regular basis against maybe the top defensive team in the league, LA will shut down any unit that really isn't able to open things up as a 5 man unit having elite PMDs etc. And with shut down I mean shut down all offense besides the offense you can't shut down, a few goals are always scores here and there. But it's a helluva lot harder to just go to the net against LAK the way they were playing in the finals compared to how hard it is to score those goals against a Dallas or Toronto during the regular season...
I mean, I don't think Nash could have been the difference against LA. We as a team didn't do enough to enable a scorer to be the difference make from my POV, Nash should and could have been better -- but not to the extent where he steps on the ice and wins it against LA, unless of course he has extreme luck and just happens to have all the pucks to his way in those close games but that's not how it works.