I don't think you'll really find any perfect parallels but I can think of a few that sorta make sense.
Lebron/Lemieux is a pretty good one. Both have insane skill for their size. They both have fans who will argue they're the greatest of all time despite the majority putting them right underneath Jordan/Gretzky. Despite Lemieux having injury/longevity issues, his game aged very well even into his late age and was still arguably the best player in the league at his old age, much like Lebron. Both players also brought championships to somewhat pitiful franchises and gave them legitimacy.
I've always said Lafleur and Kobe had some similarities. Both were traded in some way to their league's most historically relevant franchises in LA/MTL. Both were touted as amazing talents but took a few seasons to hit full stride due to their coaches easing them into the starting position. Both were amazing in the playoffs and won multiple scoring titles. Both won 5 championships each and both played on dynasties.
You could also argue Jagr and Kobe are similar as both were great offensive talents who were overshadowed by even more dominant superstars for a good portion of their careers.
Patrick Roy kinda reminds me of Larry Bird. Both were extremely confident and competitive players that antagonized their opponents. Both played for historic franchises and delivered multiple championships, and multiple playoff MVPs. Both players weren't necessarily known for their athleticism but were able to take over games with their fundamental skills. Both players were dethroned by freaks of nature that went on to take their leagues by storm with their superior athleticism and unprecedented dominance.
I'd honestly say Orr and Jordan are better comparables than Jordan and Gretzky. Both players were the best offensively and equally effective in the defensive aspects of their respective games. Both were so athletically superior to their peers that they embarrassed them on a nightly basis. Both players were able to make a claim for GOAT in their respective sports despite playing fewer than 10 years in their prime. And both players were able to take their respective sports to new levels of popularity the way they dominated the league.
Zion Williamson kinda reminds me of Lindros in some ways. Like Lindros, Zion was touted as a generational prospect with the ability to be the greatest player in the league due to their combination of skill and size. Also like Lindros, Zion has had a good portion of his career derailed by injuries. To be fair, Zion still has the potential to take the league by storm, but he does remind me of him a good bit.
Kyrie sorta reminds me of Kovalev. Like Kovalev, Kyrie has arguably the greatest handles in the history of their respective leagues. They both are extremely talented players who have been criticized (perhaps unfairly) for their inconsistency.
Beliveau and Bill Russel are obviously very good comparables.
And lastly, Nick Lidstrom and Tim Duncan. Both were "boring", fundamental players who avoided flashy play and were good for a very long time. Both were cornerstones of multiple championships for their teams as well.